Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Compare jQuery 3.6.0 vs 3.2.1 performance
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
jQuery 3.6.0 vs jQuery 3.2.1
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.0.js'></script> <script type="text/javascript"> var jq331 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.2.1/jquery.js'></script> <script type="text/javascript"> var jq214 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <div id="testElement"></div>
Tests:
jQuery 3.6.0
var element = jq331('#testElement'); element.removeClass('test-class'); element.addClass('test-class'); element.removeClass('test-class');
jQuery 3.2.1
var element = jq214('#testElement'); element.removeClass('test-class'); element.addClass('test-class'); element.removeClass('test-class');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
jQuery 3.6.0
jQuery 3.2.1
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 128 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=554454" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
jQuery 3.2.1
358K/s
jQuery 3.6.0
346K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
jQuery 3.2.1
357,905 Ops/sec
jQuery 3.6.0
345,901 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is comparing the performance of two versions of jQuery, specifically: * jQuery 3.6.0 * jQuery 3.2.1 The script preparation code loads both versions of jQuery and initializes them with `$.noConflict(true)`, which allows us to use `$` as a global variable without conflicts. **Script Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code sets up a basic HTML structure with an empty `<div>` element, which will be used as the target element for the benchmarking test. The script tags load both versions of jQuery. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **jQuery 3.6.0** * The benchmark definition is: ```javascript var element = jq331('#testElement'); element.removeClass('test-class'); element.addClass('test-class'); element.removeClass('test-class'); ``` This code uses jQuery 3.6.0 (denoted by `jq331`) to remove and add a class called "test-class" from the `<div>` element. 2. **jQuery 3.2.1** * The benchmark definition is: ```javascript var element = jq214('#testElement'); element.removeClass('test-class'); element.addClass('test-class'); element.removeClass('test-class'); ``` This code uses jQuery 3.2.1 (denoted by `jq214`) to perform the same operations as the previous test case. **Comparison** The comparison is between the two versions of jQuery, specifically in terms of their performance when executing this particular benchmarking test. **Pros and Cons:** * **Using a specific version of jQuery:** + Pros: - Ensures consistency across different versions. - Reduces the impact of version-specific bugs or quirks. + Cons: - May limit the benchmark's relevance to other environments using different versions. - Can be less representative of real-world scenarios. * **Using `$` as a global variable:** + Pros: - Simplifies code and reduces conflicts between libraries. + Cons: - May lead to subtle performance differences due to the use of `$.noConflict()` **Other Considerations:** * **Browser and device support:** The benchmark is run on Chrome 128, which may not be representative of other browsers or devices. * **Optimization techniques:** The code does not appear to include any optimization techniques, such as caching or memoization, which could impact performance. **Alternatives:** * Other microbenchmarks that compare different JavaScript libraries or frameworks. * Benchmarks that test specific features or syntax in modern JavaScript (e.g., async/await, classes, or modules). * Larger-scale benchmarks that simulate real-world scenarios, such as loading and rendering large datasets.
Related benchmarks
jQuery 3.3.1 selector vs jQuery 2.1.4 vs document.querySelector vs document.getElementById
Compare jQuery 3.6.1 vs. 3.2.1 Performance
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?