Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
JavaScript spread operator vs spread to params
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Using the spread operator vs Using spread to params
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Using the spread operator
function passFn(obj) { console.log(obj); } const firstObject = { id: 10737, developer: 'СТРАНА Девелопмент', residentialComplexName: 'asd', residentialComplexLink: 'asd', city: 'Москва', station: '', address: '', releaseDate: '', }; const secondObject = { sumMin: '', sumMax: '', image: '', roomsCount: '', squareMeters: '', apartSumMin: '', apartSumMax: '', regulationLink: 'asd', presentationDeveloperLink: '', presentationComplexLink: 'asd', }; const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject, }; passFn(finalObject);
Using spread to params
function passFn(obj) { console.log(obj); } const firstObject = { id: 10737, developer: 'СТРАНА Девелопмент', residentialComplexName: 'asd', residentialComplexLink: 'asd', city: 'Москва', station: '', address: '', releaseDate: '', }; const secondObject = { sumMin: '', sumMax: '', image: '', roomsCount: '', squareMeters: '', apartSumMin: '', apartSumMax: '', regulationLink: 'asd', presentationDeveloperLink: '', presentationComplexLink: 'asd', }; passFn({ ...firstObject, secondObject });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Using the spread operator
Using spread to params
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is testing two approaches to merge two objects: 1. **Using the spread operator (`...`)**: This approach uses the spread syntax to merge two objects into a new object, like `const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };`. 2. **Using spread to params**: This approach passes two objects as separate arguments to a function that merges them, like `passFn({ ...firstObject, secondObject });`. **Options being compared** The benchmark is comparing the performance of these two approaches. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Using the spread operator (`...`)**: * Pros: concise, readable, and efficient. * Cons: may not be as performant for very large objects due to the overhead of creating a new object. 2. **Using spread to params**: * Pros: can be more flexible for certain use cases (e.g., passing objects as separate arguments). * Cons: less readable, and may have performance implications due to function call overhead. **Library and syntax** None mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that JavaScript is a dynamically-typed language, which means you don't need explicit type definitions or library imports for most operations. **Special JS feature/syntax** No specific JavaScript features or syntax are highlighted in this benchmark, but using the spread operator is a relatively modern feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018). **Other alternatives** There are other ways to merge objects in JavaScript, such as: * Using `Object.assign()`: This method takes one or more source objects and merges their properties into a target object. * Using the `reduce()` method: This method can be used to create a new object by merging two objects. Example using `Object.assign()`: ```javascript const finalObject = Object.assign({}, firstObject, secondObject); ``` Example using `reduce()`: ```javascript const finalObject = Object.values(firstObject).reduce((acc, value, index) => { acc[value] = secondObject[index]; return acc; }, {}); ``` However, these alternatives may not be as concise or readable as the spread operator approach. **Benchmark result** The benchmark results show that Chrome 103 is executing the `Using spread to params` test case more frequently than the `Using the spread operator` test case, with approximately 20 times more executions per second. This suggests that using the spread operator may be faster in this particular scenario.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.slice(0) vs spread operator
Array push vs spread operator
spread operator vs push Brian
spread operator vs push Brian2
JS array spread operator vs push
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?