Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
compare negative zero
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Infinity conditional vs Object is
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Infinity conditional
if(1/-0 === -Infinity){ }
Object is
if(Object.is(-0,-0)){}
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Infinity conditional
Object is
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test, where users can create and run tests to measure performance differences between various approaches. In this case, we have two individual test cases: "Infinity conditional" and "Object is". **Test Cases** 1. **Infinity Conditional**: The benchmark definition is `if(1/-0 === -Infinity){ }`. This test checks how different browsers handle the expression `-0` (negative zero) in a conditional statement. In JavaScript, `-0` is not considered equal to `0`, and it's not exactly equal to `-Infinity`. However, many browsers have historically returned `true` when comparing `1/-0` with `-Infinity` due to optimizations or bugs. This test aims to determine how modern browsers (like Chrome 103) handle this specific case. 2. **Object.is**: The benchmark definition is `if(Object.is(-0,-0)){}`. This test checks how different browsers perform the comparison using `Object.is()`, which is a built-in method for comparing values in a way that's designed to behave more predictably than the usual `===` operator. **Comparison Options** In this benchmark, two main approaches are compared: * The traditional JavaScript approach, which uses the `===` operator. * The `Object.is()` method, introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), for comparing values. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Traditional JavaScript (`===`)** * Pros: Widely supported by older browsers and easier to implement. * Cons: Can return incorrect results due to various browser optimizations or bugs. 2. **`Object.is()`** + Pros: Designed to provide more predictable results for certain edge cases, like NaN (Not a Number) and Infinity values. + Cons: Introduced in ES6, so may not be supported by older browsers. **Other Considerations** * In the provided benchmark, both tests use Chrome 103 as the browser. This is likely because the developer wants to test modern browser behavior. * The benchmark measures executions per second (`ExecutionsPerSecond`) instead of raw execution time or other performance metrics. **Library/Feature Explanation (if applicable)** None mentioned in this case. **Special JS Feature/Syntax Explanation (if applicable)** The `Infinity` and `-0` values are special numbers in JavaScript. `Infinity` is a special value representing the result of a division by zero, while `-0` is a special value representing negative zero. In modern browsers like Chrome 103, these values behave differently than their traditional behavior. The benchmark tests how these browsers handle specific cases involving these values. **Other Alternatives** * For older browsers that don't support `Object.is()`, the traditional JavaScript approach (`===`) would be used. * Alternative testing frameworks or tools might be used to run the benchmarks, such as Jest or Mocha. * Different browsers or browser versions could be tested for their performance differences in these specific cases.
Related benchmarks:
Which operator is faster for indexOf ( '>' vs '===' ) is faster?
Natural Sorting Methods Tested
Which comparison operator (> vs === vs !truthy) is faster?
Multiply vs subtract
Fastest results
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?