Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Which operator is faster for indexOf ( '>' vs '===' ) is faster?
(version: 0)
Is there a performance benefit to replacing > with !==?
Comparing performance of:
test greater than vs test strict equality
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
test greater than
var n = -999; while(true) { n++; if(n > -1) break; }
test strict equality
var n = -999; while(true) { n++; if(n === -1) break; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
test greater than
test strict equality
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help explain the benchmark and its results. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares the performance of two operators: `>` (greater than) and `'==='` (strict equality). The test aims to determine whether replacing `>` with `'!==```(not equal to)` has any noticeable performance benefits. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the execution speed of two approaches: 1. **Original code**: Using the `>` operator for greater-than comparison. 2. **Replaced code**: Replacing the `>` operator with `'!==`` (strict inequality). **Pros and Cons** * **Original code (`>`)**: + Pros: Simple, widely supported, and well-established. + Cons: May not provide precise control over comparisons due to its behavior with NaNs (Not a Number) values. * **Replaced code (`'!==')**: + Pros: More explicit and precise control over comparisons, which can help avoid unexpected results. + Cons: Less widely supported, may have performance overhead due to the added comparison. In general, for simple numerical comparisons, the `>` operator is sufficient. However, when working with more complex logic or ensuring precise control over equality checks, using `'!==`` (strict inequality) might be a better choice. **Library Usage** The benchmark does not explicitly mention any libraries used in the provided test cases. However, it's likely that standard JavaScript functionality is being utilized without external dependencies. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There are no specific features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** For similar benchmarks, you might explore other microbenchmarking tools like: * micro-benchmark (a Python library for comparing performance) * Benchmark.js (a Node.js-specific benchmarking tool) * jsPerf (a built-in JavaScript benchmarking tool) These alternatives can provide more advanced features, customization options, and support for various programming languages. I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark and its results!
Related benchmarks:
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster?
Which operator is faster for indexOf ( '>' vs '!==' ) is faster?
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster2?
Which comparison operator (> vs ===) is faster?
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?