Benchmark: Testing jQuery vs JavaScript Perfomance More

HTML Preparation code:

<script
			  src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.1.0.js"
			  integrity="sha256-slogkvB1K3VOkzAI8QITxV3VzpOnkeNVsKvtkYLMjfk="
			  crossorigin="anonymous"></script>


<div class="one">test1</div>
<div class="two">test2</div>

Tests:

multiple
$('.one, .two').hide();
Single
$('.one').hide(); $('.two').hide();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
multiple
Single

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll explain the benchmark in detail.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark measures the performance difference between using jQuery to hide multiple elements versus hiding them individually. The test creates a simple HTML page with two elements, each containing a different text content ("test1" and "test2"). The benchmark script uses jQuery to hide both elements.

**Options Compared**

There are two options being compared:

1. **Multiple Hides**: `$('.one, .two').hide();`
	* This option hides both elements simultaneously using the comma-separated selector.
	* Pros:
		+ Faster execution time since only one DOM manipulation is performed.
	* Cons:
		+ May cause issues if multiple elements with the same class name are present, leading to unexpected behavior.
2. **Single Hides**: `$('.one').hide();\r\n$('.two').hide();`
	* This option hides each element individually using separate selectors.
	* Pros:
		+ More predictable behavior when dealing with multiple elements having the same class name.
	* Cons:
		+ Slower execution time since two DOM manipulations are performed.

**Library and Its Purpose**

The benchmark uses jQuery, a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation and event handling. In this case, jQuery is used to select and hide HTML elements.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax (Not Applicable)**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark.

**Benchmark Preparation Code**

The preparation code creates a simple HTML page with two elements containing different text content:

```html
<div class="one">test1</div>
<div class="two">test2</div>
```

And includes the jQuery script from a CDN:

```javascript
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.1.0.js" integrity="sha256-slogkvB1K3VOkzAI8QITxV3VzpOnkeNVsKvtkYLMjfk=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
```

**Individual Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

1. **Multiple**: `$('.one, .two').hide();`
2. **Single**: `$('.one').hide();\r\n$('.two').hide();`

Each test case is a separate benchmark that measures the performance of hiding elements using either method.

**Latest Benchmark Result**

The latest result shows the execution time per second for each test case:

| Test Name | Execution Per Second |
| --- | --- |
| Multiple | 61403.15625 |
| Single | 60421.1640625 |

This suggests that hiding multiple elements simultaneously is slightly faster than hiding them individually.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, consider the following:

1. **Vanilla JavaScript**: Instead of using jQuery, you can use plain JavaScript DOM methods to hide elements.
2. **Other libraries**: Other libraries like React or Angular might have different performance characteristics for hiding elements.
3. **Different selectors**: Experimenting with different CSS selectors or attribute-based selectors might impact performance.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may introduce additional complexity or trade-offs, so it's essential to evaluate their suitability based on your specific use case and requirements.

Related benchmarks:

Testing jQuery vs JavaScript Perfomance More (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: multiple vs Single

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

multiple

Single

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):