Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.slice vs Lodash drop
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash drop vs Array.prototype.slice
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="lodash.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var array = [...Array(1000).keys()];
Tests:
Lodash drop
_.drop(array)
Array.prototype.slice
array.slice(1)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash drop
Array.prototype.slice
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and analyze what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test created using MeasureThat.net. The goal of this benchmark is to compare the performance of two approaches: `Array.prototype.slice` (native JavaScript method) and `Lodash.drop` (a function from the popular Lodash library). **What's Being Tested?** The test measures the execution time and number of executions per second for each approach, comparing: 1. **Native JavaScript Method**: `array.slice(1)` 2. **Lodash Library Function**: `_.drop(array)` These two approaches are being compared to determine which one is faster. **Options Compared** The options being compared are: * Native JavaScript method: `array.slice(1)` + Pros: - Faster execution time, as it's a native function - Typically more efficient and optimized for performance + Cons: - May not be as readable or maintainable for complex codebases - Can be less flexible due to limitations in the underlying implementation * Lodash library function: `_.drop(array)` + Pros: - Often used and well-established, providing a familiar API - Can offer additional features or functionality beyond native methods + Cons: - May introduce overhead due to the library's complexity and dependencies - Can be slower than native methods for simple use cases **Other Considerations** * **Functionality**: Both approaches perform similar tasks, but `_.drop(array)` also offers additional features like handling edge cases or iterating over arrays. * **Code Readability**: The native JavaScript method may be less readable or maintainable due to its concise syntax, while the Lodash library function provides a more explicit and structured API. **Library Used** The test uses the Lodash library, which is a popular utility library for functional programming in JavaScript. It offers various functions, including `drop`, that can simplify code and improve performance. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark that would require specific knowledge or handling. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to compare with the native JavaScript method and Lodash library function could include: * Using a different library, such as `Array.prototype.slice` from ECMAScript 2022 (ES22) or a custom implementation * Implementing the functionality manually without using a library * Testing other optimization techniques, like caching or memoization Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be relevant to this specific benchmark and may require additional modifications to the test setup.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.filter vs Lodash filter
Array.prototype.slice vs Lodash slice
Array.prototype.slice vs Lodash take
Array.prototype.slice vs _.take
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?