Benchmark: jQuery vs Vanilla Text Node

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.0.min.js" integrity="sha256-/xUj+3OJU5yExlq6GSYGSHk7tPXikynS7ogEvDej/m4=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<div id="div1">X</div>

Script Preparation code:

var el = document.getElementById('div1');
var jQel = $('#div1');

Tests:

JS
el.innerText = 'y';
jQuery
jQel.text('y');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
JS
jQuery

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: using vanilla JavaScript and jQuery to update the text content of an HTML element.

**Test Case 1: Vanilla JavaScript**

In this test case, the code sets the `innerText` property of the element `el` directly. The benchmark measures how many executions per second (i.e., how fast the code executes) for this approach.

**Pros and Cons:**

* **Pros:** This approach is simple and widely supported by most browsers.
* **Cons:** It may not be as efficient as other approaches, especially in older browsers that don't support `innerText`.

**Test Case 2: jQuery**

In this test case, the code uses jQuery's `text()` method to update the text content of the element `jQel`. The benchmark measures how many executions per second for this approach.

* **Pros:** jQuery provides a convenient and widely supported API for updating HTML content.
* **Cons:** It adds an extra layer of complexity and may introduce performance overhead due to the library's overhead.

**Library: jQuery**

jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation, event handling, and other tasks. In this benchmark, it's used to provide a convenient way to update HTML content using the `text()` method.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax: None**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in these benchmarks.

**Other Alternatives:**

For updating text content, other alternatives exist, such as:

* Using the `innerHTML` property (less efficient than `innerText`)
* Creating a new element with the desired text and appending it to the original element
* Using a templating engine like Handlebars or Mustache

These alternatives may have different performance characteristics and trade-offs.

**Benchmark Preparation Code**

The script preparation code sets up an HTML element (`div1`) and retrieves references to it using both vanilla JavaScript (`el = document.getElementById('div1')`) and jQuery (`jQel = $('#div1')`). The HTML preparation code includes the jQuery library and defines a simple HTML structure with the desired text content.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The benchmark definition provides two test cases, each specifying a different approach (vanilla JavaScript or jQuery) to update the text content of the element.

Related benchmarks:

jQuery vs Vanilla Text Node (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: JS vs jQuery

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

JS

jQuery

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):