Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
branchfuncofbranchlessmapfunc
(version: 0)
idk
Comparing performance of:
branch vs branchless map
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var branchlessMap = [function(){return "error"}, function(a, b){return a - b ^ a}, function(a, b) {return a ** b}]; var global; var thing = 50;
Tests:
branch
thing *= 2; if(thing > 100) { global = thing - 100 ^ thing; } else { global = "error"; } if(thing < 100) { global = thing ** 100; } else { global = "error"; }
branchless map
thing *= 2; global = branchlessMap[(thing > 100) * 1](thing); global = branchlessMap[(thing < 100) * 2](thing);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
branch
branchless map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark is defined by two scripts: `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`. The script preparation code defines a JavaScript array called `branchlessMap`, which contains three functions: 1. `return "error"`: a simple function that returns the string "error". 2. `return a - b ^ a`: a function that takes two arguments, performs subtraction and bitwise XOR on them, and returns the result. 3. `return a ** b`: a function that raises the first argument to the power of the second. The script preparation code also declares a global variable `global` and assigns it an initial value of 50 using the `var thing = 50;` statement. **Test Cases:** There are two test cases: 1. "branch": * The benchmark definition is a JavaScript expression that checks if the value of `thing` is greater than 100. If true, it sets `global` to the result of `(thing - 100) ^ thing`. Otherwise, it sets `global` to `"error"`. 2. "branchless map": * The benchmark definition uses the `branchlessMap` array to call two functions based on a conditional statement. + If `thing > 100`, it calls `branchlessMap[(thing > 100) * 1](thing)`. + If `thing < 100`, it calls `branchlessMap[(thing < 100) * 2](thing)`. **Comparison:** The two test cases compare the performance of conditional statements (with branching) versus using an array-based approach to select functions based on conditions (`branchless map`). **Pros and Cons:** **Branching (Test Case "branch")** Pros: * Easy to understand and maintain. * Can be optimized by minimizing branch prediction errors. Cons: * May lead to slower performance due to branching. * Can result in higher overhead for conditional checks. **Branchless Map (Test Case "branchless map")** Pros: * Can lead to better performance due to reduced branching. * Avoids the overhead of explicit conditional checks. Cons: * Requires a more complex understanding of array indexing and function selection. * May be less maintainable due to its abstract nature. **Library:** The `branchlessMap` array is not a standard library, but rather a custom implementation by the benchmark creator. It provides an alternative way to select functions based on conditions without using branching statements. **Special JS Feature/Syntax:** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The code uses standard JavaScript syntax and features like bitwise XOR (`^`) and exponentiation (`**`). **Alternatives:** Other alternatives for the "branchless map" approach could include: 1. Using a lookup table or a hash-based approach to quickly select functions. 2. Employing other array-based data structures, such as `Map` objects or `Set`s, to store function mappings. 3. Utilizing compiler optimizations like inlining or function selection at compile-time. Keep in mind that the choice of alternative depends on the specific use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Option chaining and typeof
Option chaining and typeof 2
void 0 and undefined in deep call stack - 3
void 0 and undefined in deep call stack - 4
void 0 and undefined in deep call stack - 5
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?