Benchmark: Vanilla-vs-Jquery-lilith

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="nhngodo">Hi! NHNgodo!</div>

Tests:

JQUERY
$("#nhngodo").text("Hello World!");
Vanilla Javascript
document.getElementById("nhngodo").innerText = "Hi! NHNgodo!";

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
JQUERY
Vanilla Javascript

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares two approaches: using vanilla JavaScript (without any external libraries) and using jQuery, a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation. The benchmark is designed to measure which approach is faster in terms of executing a specific task: selecting an element in the DOM and manipulating its text content.

**Options Compared**

In this case, there are only two options being compared:

1. **Vanilla JavaScript**: This approach uses native JavaScript functions to manipulate the DOM, without relying on any external libraries.
2. **jQuery**: This approach uses jQuery's API to select an element in the DOM and manipulate its text content.

**Pros and Cons**

**Vanilla JavaScript:**

Pros:

* Lighter weight and faster execution due to no additional library dependencies
* More control over the underlying DOM manipulation mechanisms

Cons:

* Requires more code and manual effort to achieve the same result as jQuery
* May not work across all browsers or devices that support native JavaScript features

**jQuery:**

Pros:

* Faster development time and reduced coding effort due to its extensive API and shortcut functions
* Works across most browsers and devices, with minimal modifications required

Cons:

* Additional library dependency adds weight and potential overhead
* Less control over the underlying DOM manipulation mechanisms compared to vanilla JavaScript

**Library Used: jQuery**

In this benchmark, jQuery is used as a library to provide additional functionality for DOM manipulation. jQuery's API offers several benefits, such as shortcut functions (`$()` instead of `document.getElementById()`) and optimized DOM manipulation algorithms.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing the performance of two different approaches to manipulating the DOM.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative libraries or frameworks that can be used for DOM manipulation, some popular options include:

* React
* Angular
* Vue.js

These frameworks provide additional benefits like component-based architecture, virtual DOM, and more, but may introduce additional complexity and overhead compared to vanilla JavaScript.

**Benchmark Preparation Code**

The provided HTML preparation code includes a reference to jQuery 3.1.1, which is loaded from an external CDN (Content Delivery Network). This allows the benchmark to test both vanilla JavaScript and jQuery approaches without requiring any modifications to the underlying HTML structure.

**Individual Test Cases**

Each individual test case represents a single execution of the benchmarked function:

* **Test Case 1: "JQUERY"**
	+ Benchmark Definition: `($(" #nhngodo ").text(" Hello World! ");`
	+ This line of code uses jQuery's `$()` function to select the element with ID "nhngodo" and sets its text content to "Hello World!".
* **Test Case 2: "Vanilla Javascript"**
	+ Benchmark Definition: `document.getElementById("nhngodo").innerText = "Hi! NHNgodo!";`
	+ This line of code uses native JavaScript's `document.getElementById()` function to select the element with ID "nhngodo" and sets its `innerText` property to "Hi! NHNgodo!".

Both test cases aim to execute a similar task, but using different approaches. The benchmark results provide insight into which approach is faster in terms of execution frequency (ExecutionsPerSecond).

Related benchmarks:

Vanilla-vs-Jquery-lilith (version: 0)

This selects an element in the DOM and just manipulates its text content

Comparing performance of: JQUERY vs Vanilla Javascript

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

JQUERY

Vanilla Javascript

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):