Benchmark: regex vs RegExp vs indexof vs indexOf and substr

HTML Preparation code:

<div></div>

Script Preparation code:

window.regex = /^test/;
window.regexp = new RegExp(/^test/);
window.match = 'test';
var data = window.data = [];
const possible = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789";
var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS = 100000;

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * max);
}

function makeRandomString(len) {
  var text = "";
  for( var i=0; i < len; i++ ) {
    text += possible.charAt(getRandomInt(possible.length));
  }
  return text;
}

while (data.length < TOTAL_STRINGS) {
  data.push(makeRandomString(getRandomInt(20)));
}

Tests:

regEx
var x = 0; var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS; var data = window.data; var regex = window.regex; while (x < TOTAL_STRINGS) { const str = data[x]; regex.test(str); x += 1; }
RegExp
var x = 0; var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS; var data = window.data; var regexp = window.regexp; while (x < TOTAL_STRINGS) { const str = data[x]; regexp.test(str); x += 1; }
indexof and substr
var x = 0; var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS; var data = window.data; var match = window.match; while (x < TOTAL_STRINGS) { const str = data[x]; const posAt = str.indexOf(match); str.substr(posAt, 1); x += 1; }
indexOf
var x = 0; var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS; var data = window.data; var match = window.match; while (x < TOTAL_STRINGS) { const str = data[x]; str.indexOf(match) === 0; x += 1; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
regEx
RegExp
indexof and substr
indexOf

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the benchmark test case.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of four different approaches:

1. `regex`: using a regular expression (`^` anchor) to search for a pattern in strings.
2. `RegExp`: creating an instance of the `RegExp` class and using its `test()` method to search for a pattern in strings.
3. `indexOf` (with `substr`): using the `indexOf()` method to find the position of a substring, and then using `substr()` to extract a single character from the string at that position.
4. `indexOf`: using only the `indexOf()` method without `substr()`.

**Options Compared**

Each test case is comparing the performance of one specific approach (1, 2, or 3) against another (`indexof` with and without `substr`). The comparison is done within the same browser version and configuration.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach:**

* `regex`: efficient for pattern matching, but can be slower due to regex engine overhead. Pros: flexible, widely supported; Cons: complex syntax, potential performance issues.
* `RegExp`: more explicit than `regex`, but with similar performance characteristics. Pros: readable, maintainable code; Cons: verbose syntax, less flexible than native regex.
* `indexOf` (with `substr`): using `substr()` can be slower due to string slicing overhead. Pros: simple, easy to understand; Cons: performance impact, requires two method calls.
* `indexOf`: a single method call with no string slicing overhead. Pros: concise, efficient; Cons: may not work correctly if the pattern is not found.

**Library Used**

No external libraries are used in this benchmark. However, some built-in JavaScript methods are utilized:

* `RegExp` class
* `String.prototype.indexOf()`
* `String.prototype.substr()`

Related benchmarks:

regex vs RegExp vs indexof vs indexOf and substr (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: regEx vs RegExp vs indexof and substr vs indexOf

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

regEx

RegExp

indexof and substr

indexOf

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):