Benchmark: Regex vs .indexOf vs .startsWith 2

HTML Preparation code:

<div></div>

Script Preparation code:

window.regex = /test/;
window.match = 'test';
var data = window.data = [];
const possible = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789";
var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS = 100000;

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * max);
}

function makeRandomString(len) {
  var text = "";
  for( var i=0; i < len; i++ ) {
    text += possible.charAt(getRandomInt(possible.length));
  }
  return text;
}

while (data.length < TOTAL_STRINGS) {
  data.push(makeRandomString(getRandomInt(20)));
}

Tests:

Regex
var x = 0; var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS; var data = window.data; var regex = window.regex; while (x < TOTAL_STRINGS) { const str = data[x]; regex.test(str); x += 1; }
.indexOf
var x = 0; var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS; var data = window.data; var match = window.match; while (x < TOTAL_STRINGS) { const str = data[x]; str.indexOf(match) !== -1; x += 1; }
.startsWith
var x = 0; var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS; var data = window.data; var match = window.match; while (x < TOTAL_STRINGS) { const str = data[x]; str.startsWith(match); x += 1; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Regex
.indexOf
.startsWith

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 134 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

.indexOf

15K/s

.startsWith

1K/s

Regex

524/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ .indexOf	15,471 Ops/sec
.startsWith	1,486 Ops/sec
Regex	524 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided benchmark tests three different string manipulation methods: regular expressions (regex), `indexOf()`, and `startsWith()`. The test creates an array of random strings, iterates over them, and applies each method to check if a specific substring (`"test"`) is present in the string. The goal is to measure the performance difference between these three approaches.

**Options Compared**

1. **Regex**: Uses a regular expression object (`window.regex = /test/;`) to match the substring `"test"` against each string.
2. `indexOf()`: Searches for the specified substring using the `indexOf()` method, which returns the index of the first occurrence or -1 if not found.
3. `startsWith()`: Checks if the string starts with the specified substring using the `startsWith()` method.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Regex**:
	* Pros: Efficient for searching patterns in strings, flexible, and powerful.
	* Cons: Can be slower due to the overhead of compiling a regex pattern, may not work correctly for certain edge cases, and can lead to performance issues if the pattern is complex.
2. `indexOf()`:
	* Pros: Fast, simple, and widely supported.
	* Cons: May not be suitable for searching patterns, as it only checks for exact matches.
3. `startsWith()`:
	* Pros: Simple, fast, and efficient for checking if a string starts with a specific substring.
	* Cons: May not work correctly for cases where the start of the string is not the first character (e.g., `startsWith("abc", "a")` returns false).

**Library/Functionality Used**

None of these methods rely on external libraries. However, `indexOf()` and `startsWith()` are built-in methods in JavaScript.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

The benchmark doesn't explicitly use any special JS features or syntax that would affect the performance comparison. The focus is on comparing the inherent efficiency of each method.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative string manipulation methods, consider:

1. `includes()`: Similar to `indexOf()`, but returns true as soon as the substring is found.
2. `endsWith()`: Checks if a string ends with a specific substring.
3. `replace()`: Replaces occurrences of a pattern in a string.
4. `split()` and `join()`: Splits or joins strings based on patterns.

These alternatives might offer better performance for specific use cases, but their choice depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your project.

Regex vs .indexOf vs .startsWith 2 (version: 0)

Testing some things

Comparing performance of: `Regex vs .indexOf vs .startsWith`

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Regex

.indexOf

.startsWith

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Regex vs .indexOf vs .startsWith 2 (version: 0)

Testing some things

Comparing performance of: Regex vs .indexOf vs .startsWith

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Regex

.indexOf

.startsWith

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Regex vs .indexOf vs .startsWith`