Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
testtesttesttesttestv
(version: 0)
hihihihihi
Comparing performance of:
delete vs undefined
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var o = {x: 100}
Tests:
delete
delete o.x
undefined
o.x = undefined
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
delete
undefined
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark definition json and individual test cases represent a simple benchmarking scenario. We'll break down what's being tested, the options compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition json contains the following information: * **Name**: A unique name for the benchmark. * **Description**: A brief description of the benchmark (in this case, a simple string). * **Script Preparation Code**: The JavaScript code that's executed before running the benchmark. In this case, it initializes an object `o` with property `x` set to 100. * **Html Preparation Code**: An optional field for customizing the HTML environment. Since it's null in this example, the default settings are used. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark has two test cases: 1. **delete** * **Benchmark Definition**: The JavaScript code being tested: `delete o.x` 2. * undefined * * **Benchmark Definition**: The JavaScript code being tested: `o.x = undefined` **Comparison of Options** In this simple example, the options being compared are: * **delete**: Directly deleting the property `x` from object `o`. * **undefined**: Setting the value of property `x` to `undefined`. Pros and Cons: * **delete**: + Pros: Fastest execution time (likely because it's a simple property deletion). + Cons: May not be supported in older browsers or environments. * **undefined**: + Pros: More explicit and potentially safer than directly deleting the property. + Cons: May incur additional overhead due to the assignment operation. **Library Usage** There is no library usage mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that MeasureThat.net uses a custom JavaScript engine to execute benchmarks, which may include optimizations or features not available in standard browsers. **Special JS Features/Syntax** This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the basic language. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to compare similar operations using different approaches, you might consider: * Using a different data structure (e.g., an array instead of an object) * Testing the result of the operation (e.g., verifying that `o.x` is indeed deleted or set to `undefined`) * Using a different property name or value * Adding additional logic before or after the deletion operation (e.g., logging, caching, etc.) These alternatives would require modifying the benchmark definition and test cases accordingly.
Related benchmarks:
Var vs Let
var vs let
letvvar
Double a number
hui's test case for round
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?