Benchmark: pedroac Fizz Buzz concatenation

Tests:

`${f}${b}`
const fizzBuzz = function(n) { const result = new Array(n); for (let i = 1; i <= n; ++i) { const f = i % 3 === 0 ? 'Fizz' : ''; const b = i % 5 === 0 ? 'Buzz' : ''; let str = `${f}${b}`; if (!str) { str = i.toString(); } result[i-1] = str; } return result; }; fizzBuzz(100);
f + b
const fizzBuzz = function(n) { const result = new Array(n); for (let i = 1; i <= n; ++i) { const f = i % 3 === 0 ? 'Fizz' : ''; const b = i % 5 === 0 ? 'Buzz' : ''; let str = f + b; if (!str) { str = i.toString(); } result[i-1] = str; } return result; }; fizzBuzz(100);
if
const fizzBuzz = function(n) { const result = []; for (let i = 1; i <= n; ++i) { let str = ''; if (i % 3 === 0) { str += 'Fizz'; } if (i % 5 === 0) { str += 'Buzz'; } if (!str) { str = i.toString(); } result.push(str); } return result; }; fizzBuzz(100);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
`${f}${b}`
f + b
if

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of different approaches for generating a string representation of the Fizz Buzz sequence. The Fizz Buzz sequence is a simple mathematical concept where numbers are replaced with either "Fizz", "Buzz", or a combination of both, depending on their divisibility by 3 and 5.

**Test Cases**

There are three test cases:

1. **`${f}${b}`**: This test case uses template literals to concatenate the strings "Fizz" and "Buzz". The `${...}` syntax is used to insert the values of variables `f` and `b` into a string.
2. **`f + b`**: This test case uses the `+` operator to concatenate the strings "Fizz" and "Buzz".
3. **`if`**: This test case uses an `if` statement with the conditional operator (`?:`) to generate the Fizz Buzz sequence.

**Library and Special JS Features**

None of the test cases use any external libraries or special JavaScript features beyond the standard language syntax.

**Options Compared**

The three test cases compare different approaches for generating a string representation of the Fizz Buzz sequence:

* **Template Literals (``${f}${b}`) vs. Concatenation (`f + b)`**: Template literals are used to generate the string, while concatenation using the `+` operator is used in the second test case.
* **Array Push vs. String Concatenation**: In the third test case, an array is pushed onto a result array, whereas in the other two test cases, strings are concatenated or built incrementally.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:

1. **Template Literals (``${f}${b}`) vs. Concatenation (`f + b`)**:
	* Template literals have some advantages, such as:
		+ Readability: The code is more readable, as the concatenation is explicit.
		+ Performance: Template literals can be optimized by the JavaScript engine, making them faster.
	* However, template literals also have some disadvantages:
		+ Compatibility: Some older browsers may not support this syntax.
		+ Complexity: When used with conditional logic or loops, template literals can become complex and harder to read.
2. **Array Push vs. String Concatenation**:
	* Array push is generally more efficient than string concatenation because it avoids the overhead of creating a new string object each time.
	* However, array push also has some disadvantages:
		+ Performance: The performance difference between array push and string concatenation can be negligible for small inputs.
		+ Memory Usage: If the result array grows very large, memory usage can increase significantly.

**Other Considerations**

When writing benchmarks like this one, it's essential to consider factors beyond just code readability and complexity. These include:

* **Language Support**: Does the language or framework support the syntax used?
* **Optimizations**: Can the JavaScript engine optimize the code generated by each approach?
* **Performance**: How does each approach perform in terms of execution speed and memory usage?

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives to consider when generating a string representation of the Fizz Buzz sequence include:

* Using a `StringBuilder` or similar data structure to build the result incrementally.
* Using a `concat()` method on an array to build the result incrementally.
* Using a custom-built loop or iterative approach to generate the Fizz Buzz sequence.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may have their own pros and cons, and the best choice ultimately depends on the specific use case and requirements.

Related benchmarks:

pedroac Fizz Buzz concatenation (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `${f}${b}` vs f + b vs if

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

`${f}${b}`

f + b

if

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):