Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
push vs assignment 1234
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
push vs assignment
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
push
const arr = [] arr.push(100)
assignment
const arr = [] arr[arr.length] = 100
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
push
assignment
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark being tested. **What is tested?** The provided JSON represents two individual test cases, each comparing different approaches for adding an element to an array in JavaScript: `arr.push(100)` and `arr[arr.length] = 100`. The goal is to determine which approach is faster. **Options compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **`push`**: Using the `push` method to add an element to the end of the array. 2. **Assignment**: Directly assigning a value to the last index of the array using `arr[arr.length] = 100`. **Pros and cons of each approach** * **`push`**: + Pros: Easy to read and write, efficient in terms of memory management. + Cons: May incur additional overhead due to the need for internal array resizing, which can lead to slower performance. * **Assignment**: + Pros: Can be faster since it avoids the need for internal array resizing, resulting in fewer function calls and less memory allocation. + Cons: Less readable and more error-prone, especially if not properly handled. In general, the `push` method is considered a safer and more robust approach, while the assignment method can be beneficial for performance-critical code paths. However, the performance difference between these two approaches may not always be significant. **Library usage** There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that the `arr` variable is declared as a constant using the `const` keyword, which implies that the array will not be modified externally. **Special JavaScript features or syntax** No special JavaScript features or syntax are mentioned in the provided JSON. The code snippets only use standard JavaScript syntax and semantics. **Other alternatives** If you were to consider alternative approaches for adding an element to an array in JavaScript, some options might include: * Using `splice()` with a single element: `arr.splice(arr.length, 0, 100)`. * Using `unshift()` or `concat()`: `arr.unshift(100)` or `arr = arr.concat([100])`. Keep in mind that each of these alternatives may have its own trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and maintainability. **Benchmark preparation code** The benchmark preparation code is empty, which means that the test cases do not require any specific setup or initialization before running.
Related benchmarks:
Arrays: spread operator vs push
spread operator vs push Brian
spread operator vs push Brian2
spread vs push - simple
Array .push() vs spread operator
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?