Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Regex vs split/includes
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Regex vs Split and Join
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = '/foo/bar/baz';
Tests:
Regex
/\/bar/g.test(str);
Split and Join
str.split('/').includes('bar');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Regex
Split and Join
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark. **Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to search for a substring within a string: using regular expressions (`Regex`) versus splitting the string and checking if the substring is included (`Split and Join`). **Options Compared** The benchmark tests two options: 1. **Regex**: The first test case uses a regular expression (`/\\/bar/g.test(str);`) to search for the substring `"bar"` within the string `str`. Regular expressions provide a powerful way to match patterns in strings, but they can be computationally expensive. 2. **Split and Join**: The second test case splits the string into an array using the `split()` method (`str.split('/')`) and then checks if the substring is included using the `includes()` method (`includes('bar')`). This approach creates a temporary array and iterates over its elements, which can be less efficient than regular expressions. **Pros and Cons** * **Regex:** + Pros: - Provides a flexible way to match patterns in strings. - Can handle complex cases with anchors, quantifiers, and grouping. + Cons: - Can be computationally expensive due to the overhead of compiling and executing regular expressions. - May not be as readable or maintainable for simple substring searches. * **Split and Join:** + Pros: - Can be faster than regular expressions for simple substring searches. - More readable and maintainable, especially when dealing with complex cases. + Cons: - Creates a temporary array, which can lead to memory allocation overhead. - Less flexible than regular expressions. **Library and Purpose** In the benchmark code, `str` is an example string defined using JavaScript's template literals. It's not a library, but rather a sample input used for demonstration purposes. **Special JS Feature or Syntax (None)** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you want to test alternative approaches, here are some options: * **Regular Expression Alternatives:** + `String.prototype.indexOf()` instead of `/regex.test(str)`. + `String.prototype.localeCompare()` for case-insensitive matching. * **Split and Join Alternatives:** + Using `String.prototype.indexOf()` or `String.prototype.lastIndexOf()` to search for the substring. + Using a different separator for splitting the string, such as `\b` (word boundary). Keep in mind that these alternatives might not provide the same performance or readability benefits as regular expressions or split/join approaches. Overall, this benchmark provides a simple and straightforward way to compare the performance of two approaches: regular expressions versus split/join. By analyzing the results, developers can gain insights into which approach is more suitable for their specific use cases.
Related benchmarks:
regex vs split/pop
Regex vs split 2
Regex vs split 3
Regex vs split/join 23313
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?