Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Moment format against Date
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Moment vs Offset
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.rawgit.com/moment/moment/2.7.0/moment.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var dateObject = new Date('2016-11-03T12:00:00Z'); var format = 'YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm'; function formatDate(from) { return `${from.toLocaleDateString().replace(/\//g, '.')} ${from.toLocaleTimeString(undefined, { hour: '2-digit', minute: '2-digit' })}`; }
Tests:
Moment
moment(dateObject).format(format);
Offset
formatDate(dateObject);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Moment
Offset
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, compared, and what are the pros and cons of different approaches. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON defines two benchmark definitions: 1. `moment(dateObject).format(format);` 2. `formatDate(dateObject);` These benchmarks compare the performance of JavaScript code that uses the Moment.js library to format a date string. **Moment.js Library** Moment.js is a popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times. It provides a simple and consistent way to manipulate dates, including formatting them into human-readable strings. The library is widely used in web development applications. In this benchmark, Moment.js is used to convert a `dateObject` (a JavaScript Date object created from a string) into a formatted string using the `format()` method. The format string is specified as `YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm`. **Options Compared** The two benchmarks compare different approaches for formatting a date string: 1. **Moment.js**: Uses the Moment.js library to format the date string. 2. **Custom Function**: Defines a custom function, `formatDate()`, that takes the `dateObject` and returns the formatted string. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** **Moment.js:** Pros: * Well-tested and widely used library * Provides a simple and consistent way to format dates * Can be easily integrated into existing applications Cons: * Adds external dependency (library) * May introduce overhead due to library initialization and garbage collection **Custom Function:** Pros: * Eliminates external dependencies (no library required) * Potential for better performance since no overhead from library initialization and garbage collection Cons: * Requires custom implementation of date formatting logic * May require additional testing to ensure correct behavior in all cases **Special Considerations** The benchmark uses the `toLocaleDateString()` and `toLocaleTimeString()` methods, which are part of the ECMAScript Standard Library. These methods provide a way to format dates and times using locale-specific settings. The use of these methods allows for more flexible date formatting without relying on an external library. **Other Alternatives** If you're not comfortable with using an external library like Moment.js or prefer to implement your own custom function, here are some alternative approaches: * Use a different date formatting library, such as Luxon or Date-FNS * Implement custom date formatting logic using JavaScript's built-in `Date` object and string manipulation techniques * Consider using a templating engine, like Handlebars or Pug, to generate formatted strings Keep in mind that these alternatives may require more development effort and testing to ensure correct behavior.
Related benchmarks:
Moment format vs new Date().toISOString, no ms (moment 2.24)
Date vs Moment Formatt
Moment Date vs string
Moment UTC Tests
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?