Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Date vs Moment Formatt
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Moment vs Date
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.rawgit.com/moment/moment/2.7.0/moment.js"></script>
Tests:
Moment
moment().format('YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss');
Date
(new Date()).toLocaleTimeString();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Moment
Date
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a string that represents a JavaScript code snippet. In this case, there are two test cases: 1. `moment().format('YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss');` - This code creates a new Moment.js object using the `moment()` function and formats it as a string in the specified format. 2. `(new Date()).toLocaleTimeString();` - This code creates a new Date object using the `Date` constructor and calls the `toLocaleTimeString()` method on it. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **Moment.js**: A popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times. It provides various methods for formatting, parsing, and manipulating date objects. 2. **Native JavaScript Date API**: The built-in JavaScript Date object provides methods for formatting, parsing, and manipulating dates. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each option: 1. **Moment.js**: * Pros: + Highly customizable and flexible + Supports multiple date formats and locales + Extensive community support and documentation * Cons: + Adds an additional dependency to the benchmark + Can be slower than native JavaScript due to overhead from the library 2. **Native JavaScript Date API**: * Pros: + Fast and lightweight + Built-in, no additional dependency required * Cons: + Limited functionality compared to Moment.js + May require more code to achieve similar results **Library: Moment.js** Moment.js is a popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times. It provides various methods for formatting, parsing, and manipulating date objects. The library offers features such as: * Format strings for different locales and formats * Parsing functions for extracting date components from strings * Methods for calculating time intervals and differences In the benchmark, Moment.js is used to format a date object in the specified format (`YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss`). **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The code snippets only use standard JavaScript constructs. **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative options, here are some alternatives to Moment.js and the native JavaScript Date API: 1. **Luxon**: Another popular date and time library that offers a similar set of features to Moment.js. 2. **Date-fns**: A lightweight library for working with dates and times that provides a simple and intuitive API. 3. **JS Date Format**: A JavaScript library specifically designed for formatting dates in different locales and formats. These alternatives offer varying degrees of functionality, performance, and customization options compared to Moment.js and the native JavaScript Date API.
Related benchmarks:
Date vs Moment
Date.now() vs Moment()
Creating Date vs Moment
Date vs Moment test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?