Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Date.now() vs Moment()
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Moment vs Date
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.rawgit.com/moment/moment/2.7.0/moment.js"></script>
Tests:
Moment
moment()
Date
Date.now()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Moment
Date
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:139.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/139.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 139 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=610056" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Date
18.1M/s
Moment
3.3M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Date
18,072,854 Ops/sec
Moment
3,314,994 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases to understand what is being tested. **What is being tested:** The benchmark measures the performance of two JavaScript functions: 1. `moment()`: This function appears to be from the Moment.js library, which provides a simple way to work with dates in JavaScript. 2. `Date.now()`: This function returns the number of milliseconds since the Unix epoch (January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC) as an integer. **Options compared:** The two functions are being compared for their performance. The test aims to determine which one is faster and more efficient in JavaScript. **Pros and cons of each approach:** 1. `moment()`: * Pros: Moment.js provides a simple and intuitive API for working with dates, making it easier to parse and manipulate date strings. * Cons: Moment.js can be slower than using native JavaScript functions like `Date.now()` because it involves additional overhead from parsing the date string and creating an object. 2. `Date.now()`: * Pros: Native JavaScript functions are typically faster and more efficient since they don't involve additional overhead from parsing or object creation. * Cons: This approach requires manual handling of date strings, which can be error-prone. **Library and its purpose:** The Moment.js library is a popular JavaScript library for working with dates. It provides a simple and intuitive API for parsing and manipulating date strings, as well as performing various date-related calculations. In the context of this benchmark, using Moment.js allows users to easily work with date strings without having to manually handle the parsing and formatting. **Special JS feature or syntax:** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance of two functions that are commonly used for date-related tasks. **Other alternatives:** If you want to use alternative libraries or approaches, some options include: * Using native JavaScript functions like `Date.now()` and manually handling date string parsing. * Using other date libraries like Day.js or Luxon, which may offer better performance or features than Moment.js. * Creating a custom function for date-related tasks, which can be optimized for specific use cases. Overall, the benchmark provides a simple and straightforward way to compare the performance of two common JavaScript functions used for date-related tasks.
Related benchmarks
Date vs Moment
Creating Date vs Moment
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?