Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
MomentVSVanilla
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Vanilla vs Moment
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script>
Tests:
Vanilla
const popoverTimeout = 1646304900; new Date(Date.now() - popoverTimeout).getHours();
Moment
const popoverTimeout = 1646304900; moment.duration(moment().subtract(popoverTimeout)).asHours();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Vanilla
Moment
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark tests the performance of calculating hours from a timestamp using two different approaches: **1. Vanilla JavaScript:** This test case uses the built-in `Date` object and its methods to directly manipulate the date and extract the hours. It's a simple, core JavaScript solution. **2. Moment.js:** This test case utilizes the `moment.js` library to achieve the same calculation. `moment.js` is a popular JavaScript library specifically designed for working with dates and times, offering a wide range of functionalities beyond basic manipulation. Here's a breakdown of the pros and cons: **Vanilla JavaScript (Pros):** * **Lightweight:** No external library dependency, resulting in smaller file size and faster initial loading. * **Direct Control:** You have precise control over the underlying date operations. **Vanilla JavaScript (Cons):** * **More Verbose:** Often requires writing more code compared to libraries with higher-level abstractions. * **Potential for Errors:** More prone to errors if you're not familiar with the intricacies of JavaScript's date handling. **Moment.js (Pros):** * **Concise and Readable:** Provides cleaner syntax and abstractions, making your code more readable and maintainable. * **Feature-Rich:** Offers a vast array of functions for formatting, manipulating, comparing, and working with dates and times in various timezones. **Moment.js (Cons):** * **Larger Footprint:** Adds to the overall size of your project due to the library dependency. * **Learning Curve:** Requires learning Moment.js's specific syntax and API. **Alternatives:** * Other date/time libraries: There are various alternatives to Moment.js, such as Luxon or Date-fns, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. * Utility Libraries: Some utility libraries like Lodash might offer specific functions for date manipulation. In this specific benchmark, `moment.js` performs significantly slower than vanilla JavaScript. This is likely due to the overhead of Moment.js's extensive features and abstraction layer compared to the direct, streamlined nature of the vanilla JavaScript solution.
Related benchmarks:
moment vs datefns format f
Date vs moment 1238uu
date to iso comparaison with mutable moment
Compare moment vs native date format 2.0
date-fns vs moment
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?