Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
MomentVSVanilla
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Vanilla vs Moment
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script>
Tests:
Vanilla
const popoverTimeout = 1646304900; new Date(Date.now() - popoverTimeout).getHours();
Moment
const popoverTimeout = 1646304900; moment.duration(moment().subtract(popoverTimeout)).asHours();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Vanilla
Moment
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation. **Benchmark Description** The benchmark is called "MomentVSVanilla" and it compares two different approaches to calculating hours from a timestamp: using the `moment` library (a popular JavaScript date and time manipulation library) versus using vanilla JavaScript (i.e., plain JavaScript without any libraries). **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Vanilla**: This test case uses only vanilla JavaScript to calculate hours from a timestamp. 2. **Moment**: This test case uses the `moment` library to calculate hours from a timestamp. The benchmark definition is provided in code form, which is executed by the MeasureThat.net service. **Library: Moment** The `moment` library is used in this benchmark. It's a widely-used JavaScript library for working with dates and times. In this test case, it's used to create a moment object from the current time minus a specified timeout value (1646304900), and then calculate hours using the `asHours()` method. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** In this benchmark, there are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested. The code is straightforward and uses standard JavaScript methods and properties. **Pros/Cons of Different Approaches** Here's a brief comparison of the two approaches: * **Vanilla**: This approach uses only built-in JavaScript functions and does not require any additional libraries. It's a good option when you want to keep your dependencies minimal. + Pros: Lightweight, easy to understand, no library overhead + Cons: May be less efficient or accurate for complex date/time calculations * **Moment**: This approach uses the `moment` library, which provides a more extensive set of features and methods for working with dates and times. It's a good option when you need to perform complex date/time calculations or manipulate dates in various formats. + Pros: Provides a wide range of features and methods for date/time manipulation + Cons: Requires additional library overhead, may be overkill for simple cases **Other Alternatives** If you need to calculate hours from a timestamp without using the `moment` library, there are other alternatives: * **Date.prototype.getTime()**: You can use the `getTime()` method on the Date object to get the timestamp in milliseconds and then manually calculate the hours. * **Math.floor()**: You can use the `Math.floor()` function to round down the timestamp to the nearest hour. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as efficient or accurate as using a dedicated date/time library like Moment.
Related benchmarks:
moment vs datefns format f
Date vs moment 1238uu
date to iso comparaison with mutable moment
Compare moment vs native date format 2.0
date-fns vs moment
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?