Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash.get vs native2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash vs Native
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.11/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var secrets = {a:{b:{c:'d'}}};
Tests:
Lodash
var value = _.get(secrets, 'a');
Native
var value = secrets['a'];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash
Native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's tested in this JavaScript benchmark. **Overview** This benchmark compares the execution performance of two approaches: using the `_.get()` method from the Lodash library and accessing the nested object directly (i.e., `secrets['a']`). **Options being compared** The benchmark tests two options: 1. **Lodash**: Using the `_.get()` method to access the nested object. 2. **Native**: Accessing the nested object directly using bracket notation (`secrets['a']`). **Pros and Cons of each approach** **Lodash (`.get()`)** Pros: * Easier to write and read, especially for complex object accesses * Provides a clear and concise way to access nested objects * Can be useful when working with legacy code or APIs that expect this syntax Cons: * Requires an additional library import (Lodash) * May incur a slight performance overhead due to the additional function call * Not as straightforward as direct bracket notation for simple object accesses **Native** Pros: * Faster execution, since it avoids the function call and uses direct access * More efficient in terms of memory usage, since no extra library data is transferred * Simple and concise syntax Cons: * May require more careful handling of edge cases or errors (e.g., missing properties) * Less readable for complex object accesses, especially when using nested brackets **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for various tasks, such as array manipulation, string manipulation, and object access. The `_.get()` method is specifically designed to handle nested object access in a safe and efficient manner. **Special JS feature or syntax: None** There are no special features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. Both options use standard JavaScript syntax for accessing objects. **Other alternatives** If you want to explore alternative approaches, here are some options: * **Object.keys()** and **forEach()**: You could use `object.keys()` to get an array of property names and then iterate over it using `forEach()` to access the nested object. However, this approach might be slower than both Lodash and native bracket notation. * **JSON.parse()**: If you know the exact JSON structure of your data, you could use `JSON.parse()` to parse the string into an object. This approach would require additional error handling for cases where the input is malformed. Overall, the choice between Lodash's `.get()` method and native bracket notation depends on the specific requirements of your project, such as performance, readability, and maintainability.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash.get vs Property dot notation my test
Lodash test suite
Lodash toString vs js String Constructor
Lodash.get vs native
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?