Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash.get vs native
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash vs Native
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.11/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var secrets = {a:{b:{c:'d'}}};
Tests:
Lodash
var value = _.get(secrets, 'a.b.c');
Native
var value = secrets['a']['b']['c'];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash
Native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to accessing nested object properties: using the popular JavaScript library Lodash and using native JavaScript syntax. **Options Compared** There are two options compared: 1. **Lodash**: The first option uses Lodash, a utility library for functional programming in JavaScript. Specifically, it uses the `_get` function from Lodash to access the nested object property. 2. **Native JavaScript Syntax**: The second option uses native JavaScript syntax to achieve the same result without relying on a library. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: **Lodash:** Pros: * Easier to read and maintain, especially for complex object accesses * Provides additional functionality beyond just accessing properties (e.g., handling null/undefined values) * Can be more efficient in certain cases due to caching and memoization Cons: * Adds an extra dependency (the Lodash library) that needs to be included in the benchmark * May introduce overhead due to the need to load the library and initialize its functions **Native JavaScript Syntax:** Pros: * No additional dependencies or overhead required * More control over performance and optimization Cons: * Can lead to more verbose code, making it harder to read and maintain for complex accesses * Requires manual handling of potential edge cases (e.g., null/undefined values) **Library Used: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript library developed by Isiah Marquez. Its primary purpose is to provide functional programming utilities that can simplify common tasks in JavaScript. The `_get` function, specifically used in this benchmark, allows accessing nested object properties in a concise and readable way. **Special JS Feature/Syntax: None Mentioned** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the provided code. It's straightforward JavaScript without any advanced or esoteric concepts. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to compare other approaches for accessing nested object properties, here are some alternatives: 1. **Using `dot notation`**: Instead of using `_get`, Lodash could be replaced with a simple dot notation (e.g., `secrets.a.b.c`) for native JavaScript. 2. **Using `bracket notation`**: Another option would be to use bracket notation (e.g., `secrets['a']['b']['c']`) instead of `_get`. 3. **Using a custom function**: You could also create a custom function specifically designed for accessing nested object properties, potentially optimizing performance or handling edge cases differently. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as straightforward to implement or maintain as the Lodash and native JavaScript syntax approaches used in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash.get vs Property dot notation my test
Lodash test suite
optional chaining chrome vs lodash get
Lodash.get vs native2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?