Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
2222222222222222222222222221`
(version: 0)
12121
Comparing performance of:
1 vs 2
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Date.now()
Tests:
1
var t1 = Date.now();
2
var t2 = new Date().getTime();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
1
2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains information about the benchmark to be run. It has the following properties: * `Name`: A unique identifier for the benchmark. * `Description`: A brief description of the benchmark, which in this case appears to be a random sequence of characters. * `Script Preparation Code`: The JavaScript code that is executed before running the benchmark. In this case, it's `Date.now()`, which measures the current time in milliseconds since the Unix epoch (January 1, 1970). * `Html Preparation Code`: Optional HTML code that can be used to prepare the environment for running the benchmark. However, in this case, it's null. The purpose of the script preparation code is to ensure that the benchmark starts at a consistent point in time. By measuring the current time using `Date.now()`, we can ensure that the execution times are comparable between different runs of the benchmark. **Individual Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. The first test case has a simple JavaScript statement: `var t1 = Date.now();`. This code measures the current time in milliseconds since the Unix epoch (January 1, 1970) and assigns it to a variable named `t1`. 2. The second test case uses the `Date` object's `getTime()` method instead of `Date.now()`: `\r\nvar t2 = new Date().getTime();`. This code measures the time in milliseconds since the Unix epoch (January 1, 1970) and assigns it to a variable named `t2`. **Comparison of Options** The two test cases are comparing different ways to measure time. The first test case uses `Date.now()`, while the second test case uses `Date.getTime()`. Pros and Cons: * **`Date.now()`**: This method is more modern and widely supported across browsers. However, it may not be suitable for certain use cases where precision is required (e.g., due to browser caching or other performance issues). * **`Date.getTime()`**: This method has been available since JavaScript 1.0 and provides better support for certain time-related features, such as time zones. However, it's also more verbose than `Date.now()`, which might be a drawback. Other Considerations: * The choice of measurement unit (milliseconds or seconds) may affect the results. * Browsers like Chrome may optimize the execution of JavaScript code, including timer functions, to improve performance. **Library Usage** There doesn't appear to be any explicit library usage in these benchmark definitions. However, if a library is used implicitly through the `Date` object's methods, it would provide additional functionality or features beyond the basic timing measurement. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** None of the test cases use special JavaScript features or syntax (e.g., async/await, arrow functions, or template literals). The focus appears to be on measuring time using standard JavaScript timing functions.
Related benchmarks:
Date.now vs new Date()
Get offset ms Date vs epochms
Date comparison Date.now vs new Date
+new Date() vs Date.now()
new Intl.DateTimeFormat vs cached Intl.DateTimeFormat vs custom
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?