Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Date comparison Date.now vs new Date
(version: 0)
Compare Date.now vs new Date
Comparing performance of:
Date.now vs new Date
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Date.now
Date.now() >= new Date().getTime()
new Date
new Date() >= new Date()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Date.now
new Date
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is comparing the performance of two methods: `Date.now()` and `new Date()`. Both methods are used to get the current timestamp, but they work slightly differently. **Options Compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **`Date.now()`**: This method returns the number of milliseconds since the Unix Epoch (January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC). It's a simple and efficient way to get the current timestamp. 2. **`new Date()`**: This method creates a new `Date` object and returns the number of milliseconds since the Unix Epoch as a property of that object. It also includes additional information like the date, time zone offset, etc. **Pros and Cons** * **`Date.now()`**: + Pros: Fastest and most efficient way to get the current timestamp. + Cons: Doesn't include additional information like dates or time zones. * **`new Date()`**: + Pros: Includes additional information like dates, time zones, etc. + Cons: Slightly slower than `Date.now()`, especially for simple use cases. **Library and Purpose** Neither of these methods relies on a specific library. However, the JavaScript standard library itself provides both `Date.now()` and `new Date()` as built-in methods. No special JS features or syntax are used in this benchmark. **Other Considerations** When choosing between `Date.now()` and `new Date()`, consider whether you need additional information beyond just the timestamp. If you only need a simple, fast way to get the current timestamp, `Date.now()` is likely sufficient. However, if you need more detailed information or want to take advantage of JavaScript's built-in date object features, `new Date()` might be a better choice. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative methods to compare the performance of different timestamp-related functions in JavaScript, here are some options: 1. **`performance.now()`**: This method returns the number of milliseconds since the performance timer was started, which can provide more accurate timing results than `Date.now()`. 2. **`Date.now() + 0` or `new Date() - new Date(0)`**: These methods create a temporary date object that's immediately set to the current timestamp, providing similar performance characteristics to `Date.now()`. Keep in mind that these alternatives might introduce additional overhead or require more precise control over timing results.
Related benchmarks:
Date.now(); vs new Date()
Date.now() - Date.now() vs new Date() - new Date()
+new Date() vs Date.now()
Date.now() vs. now()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?