Benchmark: array includes vs direct assignment

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

const isPaymentMethodUpdated = false;
const isPaymentDataUpdated = false;
const isPriceDataUpdated = false;
const isCreditCardUpdated = false;
const hasPricing = false;
const isOmisePhoneStateUpdated = false;
const changeCreditCardToggled = false;
const isUserDataUpdated = false;
const hasPricingAndUpdatedPrice = isPriceDataUpdated && hasPricing

Tests:

Includes
const isPaymentMethodUpdated = false; const isPaymentDataUpdated = false; const isPriceDataUpdated = false; const isCreditCardUpdated = false; const hasPricing = false; const isOmisePhoneStateUpdated = false; const changeCreditCardToggled = false; const isUserDataUpdated = false; const hasPricingAndUpdatedPrice = isPriceDataUpdated && hasPricing const shouldUpdateBookingButton = [ hasPricingAndUpdatedPrice, isCreditCardUpdated, isPaymentDataUpdated, isOmisePhoneStateUpdated, changeCreditCardToggled, isUserDataUpdated ].includes((condition) => condition === true)
direct assignment with Or
const isPaymentMethodUpdated = false; const isPaymentDataUpdated = false; const isPriceDataUpdated = false; const isCreditCardUpdated = false; const hasPricing = false; const isOmisePhoneStateUpdated = false; const changeCreditCardToggled = false; const isUserDataUpdated = false; const hasPricingAndUpdatedPrice = isPriceDataUpdated && hasPricing const shouldUpdateBookingButton = hasPricingAndUpdatedPrice || isPaymentMethodUpdated || isCreditCardUpdated || isPaymentDataUpdated || isOmisePhoneStateUpdated || changeCreditCardToggled || isUserDataUpdated;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Includes
direct assignment with Or

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches for multiple clause conditions:

1. Using the `includes()` method on an array, specifically with a callback function as the condition.
2. Direct assignment using logical OR operators (`||`) between multiple variables.

**Options compared:**

* **Includes**: This approach uses the `includes()` method on an array to check if at least one of the conditions is true. The array contains multiple conditions, and each condition is passed as a separate argument to the callback function.
* **Direct assignment with Or**: This approach directly assigns values to variables using logical OR operators (`||`) between multiple conditions.

**Pros and Cons:**

* **Includes**:
	+ Pros:
		- Clearer code structure, especially for more complex conditions
		- Less prone to errors due to the callback function's type checking
	+ Cons:
		- Potential performance overhead due to the use of `includes()`
		- May be slower than direct assignment for simpler conditions
* **Direct assignment with Or**:
	+ Pros:
		- Can be faster for simpler conditions
		- Less memory allocation and garbage collection due to no array creation
	+ Cons:
		- Code can become cluttered and harder to read, especially for complex conditions
		- More prone to errors due to the lack of type checking

**Library used:**

* **Lodash**: The `lodash` library is included in the benchmark using the `Html Preparation Code`. Specifically, it provides the `includes()` method, which is used in one of the test cases.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

The benchmark does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax. However, it does rely on the `||` operator for logical OR assignments, which might be a common practice but not a built-in feature. It also uses the `const` keyword for variable declarations, which is a modern JavaScript feature.

**Alternative approaches:**

Other alternatives to consider:

* **Using a switch statement**: Instead of using an array with conditions, you could use a switch statement with multiple cases. This approach can be more efficient and readable but might not work well with complex condition hierarchies.
* **Using a custom function**: You could define a custom function that takes the values as arguments and returns true if any of them are true. This approach would eliminate the need for `includes()` or logical OR operators.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different trade-offs in terms of performance, code readability, and maintainability.

Related benchmarks:

array includes vs direct assignment (version: 0)

compares perf between array includes vs direct assignment for multiple or clause

Comparing performance of: Includes vs direct assignment with Or

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Includes

direct assignment with Or

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):