Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
array using every vs includes vs some
(version: 0)
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Comparing performance of:
includes vs every vs some
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var array = [true,false]
Tests:
includes
!array.includes(true)
every
array.every(v => v===false)
some
!array.some(v => v)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
includes
every
some
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
7 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.6 Safari/605.1.15 Ddg/18.6
Browser/OS:
Safari 18 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
includes
137864352.0 Ops/sec
every
121349328.0 Ops/sec
some
127799312.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the JavaScript microbenchmark provided by MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares three different methods to check if an element exists in an array: 1. `every` 2. `includes` 3. `some` These methods are often used to determine whether a certain condition is met for all or some elements in an array. **Options Compared** Here's a brief overview of each method: 1. **`every()`**: This method returns `true` if all elements of the array pass the provided test. In this case, the test checks if all elements are falsy (`v === false`). If any element is truthy, it will return `false`. * Pros: Efficient for arrays with a large number of elements where only one specific value needs to be checked. * Cons: May not be suitable for small arrays or when you need to check individual elements rather than the entire array. 2. **`includes()`**: This method returns `true` if an element is found in the array, and `false` otherwise. * Pros: Simple and intuitive, easy to read and maintain. * Cons: May be slower for very large arrays due to its iteration nature. 3. **`some()`**: This method returns `true` if at least one element passes the provided test. In this case, the test checks if any element is truthy (`v`). If no elements are truthy, it will return `false`. * Pros: Efficient for arrays with a small number of elements where only one specific value needs to be checked. * Cons: May not be suitable for large arrays or when you need to check individual elements rather than the entire array. **Library Used** The benchmark uses Lodash.js, a popular JavaScript library that provides a wide range of functional programming utilities. In this case, it's used for its `includes()` and `some()` functions. **Special JS Features/Syntax** This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the standard ES6 syntax for array methods (`every()`, `includes()`, and `some()`). **Other Alternatives** If you need to check if an element exists in an array, here are some alternative approaches: 1. Manual iteration using a loop. 2. Using `Array.prototype.findIndex()` which returns the index of the first element that satisfies the condition, or -1 if no elements satisfy it. Manual iteration would involve iterating over each element in the array and checking its value, while `Array.prototype.findIndex()` is more concise but may be slower due to its overhead. Keep in mind that these alternatives are not as efficient as using built-in methods like `every()`, `includes()`, or `some()`.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash some vs includes
IndexOf vs Includes vs lodash includes for string
Array.indexOf vs Array.includes vs lodash includes with numerical values
array using indexOf vs includes vs some
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?