Benchmark: JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance creating a new object

Tests:

Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };
Using Object.assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = Object.assign({}, firstObject, secondObject);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Using the spread operator
Using Object.assign

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net.

The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches for creating a new object by merging two existing objects: using the spread operator (`...`) and using `Object.assign()`.

**Options being compared:**

1. **Spread Operator (Spread Syntax)**: This method uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a new object that includes all properties from both source objects.
2. **Object.assign()**: This method creates a shallow copy of an existing object by merging it with another object.

**Pros and Cons:**

* **Spread Operator (Spread Syntax)**:
	+ Pros:
		- More concise and readable code
		- Can handle nested objects and arrays more easily
	+ Cons:
		- May have performance overhead due to string interpolation and property name resolution
		- Not supported in older browsers or Node.js versions (before ES6)
* **Object.assign()**:
	+ Pros:
		- Wide support across modern browsers and Node.js versions
		- Fast and efficient, especially for large objects
	+ Cons:
		- Less concise and less readable code compared to spread operator syntax
		- Requires manual property name resolution

**Other Considerations:**

* Both methods create a new object and do not modify the original objects. However, if you need to update an existing object, `Object.assign()` can be more suitable.
* If you're working with large datasets or complex objects, the performance difference between these two methods might be negligible.

**Library/Feature:**

The benchmark uses the JavaScript spread operator syntax, which is a feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018). This means that only modern browsers and Node.js versions supporting ES2018 should run this test case without issues.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax:**

As mentioned earlier, this benchmark relies on the spread operator syntax, which is a relatively new feature. If users are not familiar with this syntax or are using older JavaScript environments, they might need to adjust their code accordingly.

**Alternatives:**

For creating new objects by merging two existing ones, you can also consider other approaches like:

1. **Object.create()**: This method creates a new object with the specified prototype chain.
2. **Object.assign()` with multiple arguments (not widely supported)**: Some older browsers or Node.js versions support passing multiple arguments to `Object.assign()`, but this is not a standard feature and might not work in all environments.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might have performance overhead, security implications, or compatibility issues, so it's essential to choose the best approach for your specific use case.

Related benchmarks:

JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance creating a new object (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Using the spread operator vs Using Object.assign

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Using the spread operator

Using Object.assign

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):