Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Function typeof in High Frequency
(version: 0)
Caching function typeof
Comparing performance of:
Call typeof every time vs Cache typeof
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function test() { console.log('hi'); } window.test = test;
Tests:
Call typeof every time
for (let i = 0; i < 5000; ++i) { if (typeof window.test === 'function') { const func = window.test; } }
Cache typeof
const seen = new Set(); for (let i = 0; i < 5000; ++i) { if (seen.has(window.test)) { const func = window.test; } else { if (typeof window.test === 'function') { seen.add(window.test); const func = window.test; } } }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Call typeof every time
Cache typeof
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of two approaches: calling `typeof` on a function every time, and caching the result of `typeof` for future calls. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code defines a simple function `test()` that logs "hi" to the console. This function will be used as the test subject throughout the benchmark. ```javascript function test() { console.log('hi'); } window.test = test; ``` This code sets up a global variable `window.test` that points to the `test()` function, making it accessible throughout the benchmark. **Html Preparation Code** Since there is no HTML preparation code provided, we can assume that this benchmark is running in a headless environment or using a simple web framework like Electron or Node.js. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Call `typeof` every time**: This test case iterates over 5000 loops and checks if the global `window.test` variable has changed type (`typeof` will return `"function"`). 2. **Cache `typeof`**: In this test case, a `Set` named `seen` is created to keep track of the `window.test` variables. The loop iterates over 5000 times and checks if `window.test` is already in the `seen` set. If not, it adds it to the set and caches its type using `typeof`. **What's Being Tested** The benchmark measures the performance difference between these two approaches: * **Approach 1: Call `typeof` every time** + This approach involves checking if the global variable has changed type on each iteration. + Pros: - Simple implementation - No need to store or compare values + Cons: - Inefficient due to repeated `typeof` checks - May lead to increased CPU usage * **Approach 2: Cache `typeof`** + This approach involves storing and comparing values using a `Set`. + Pros: - Can reduce the number of `typeof` calls - Can improve performance by avoiding unnecessary checks + Cons: - Requires additional memory to store the `Set` - May lead to slower startup times **Library: Set** The `Set` data structure is a built-in JavaScript library that allows you to store unique values and check for membership. In this benchmark, the `Set` is used to cache the type of `window.test`. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax** There are no special JS features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** Some alternative approaches to caching `typeof` could include: * Using a `WeakMap` instead of a regular `Map` to store cached values. * Implementing a more complex caching mechanism using JavaScript's built-in functions, such as `Object.create()` and `Object.assign()`. * Using a third-party library like LRU Cache or memoization libraries. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different trade-offs in terms of performance, memory usage, and complexity.
Related benchmarks:
Lazy test vs call
Lazy test vs call
isFunction vs typeof function 2
testtest132123asdasda2
_.isFunction vs typeof
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?