Benchmark: slice vs substr vs substring (with no end index)2

Script Preparation code:

var example = 'there is no spoon'

Tests:

slice
var result = example.slice(10)
substr
var result = example.substr(10)
substring
var result = example.substring(10)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
slice
substr
substring

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**What's being tested:**

The benchmark is comparing three string slicing methods in JavaScript:

1. `slice()`
2. `substr()`
3. `substring()` (with no end index, i.e., only a start index)

These methods are used to extract a part of a string, and the benchmark wants to measure their performance when only using the start index.

**Options compared:**

The three options being compared are:

* `slice(start, end)`
* `substr(start)`
* `substring(start)`

Each option is tested with the same input (`example = 'there is no spoon'`).

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

1. `slice()`: This method is generally considered more efficient than the others because it's implemented in native code, which can be optimized for performance.
	* Pros: Native code implementation, potentially faster execution time
	* Cons: May not work as expected when called with a single index (as in this benchmark)
2. `substr()`: This method is also implemented in native code and is generally considered fast but has some quirks, such as always requiring an end index.
	* Pros: Fast execution time, widely supported
	* Cons: Requires an end index, which can be limiting for this benchmark
3. `substring()`: This method is a more modern implementation that allows for only starting the slice, and it's also implemented in native code.
	* Pros: More flexible than substr, still fast execution time
	* Cons: May not work as expected when called with a single index (as in this benchmark)

**Library used:**

None of these methods are part of a library; they're all built-in functions to the JavaScript language.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

There's no special feature or syntax being tested here. The focus is on the performance comparison between three standard string slicing methods.

**Benchmark results:**

The benchmark shows the execution time (in executions per second) for each method, measured across multiple runs. Based on the results:

* `slice()` is the fastest
* `substring()` comes in second, likely due to its flexibility and potential optimization
* `substr()` is slower than both `slice()` and `substring()`

**Other alternatives:**

If you were to implement your own string slicing method using JavaScript, you could consider using regular expressions or other string manipulation techniques. However, for simplicity and performance reasons, it's often recommended to stick with the built-in `slice()`, `substr()`, and `substring()` methods.

In summary, this benchmark helps measure the performance differences between three standard string slicing methods in JavaScript when only a start index is provided. It provides insights into which method is most efficient and flexible for this specific use case.

Related benchmarks:

slice vs substr vs substring (with no end index)2 (version: 0)

Compares slice, substr and substring to each other when there is only a start index

Comparing performance of: slice vs substr vs substring

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

slice

substr

substring

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):