Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
jquery 3.6.0
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Vanilla JS ID test vs Vanilla JS Class test vs jQuery ID Test vs jQuery Class Test
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.0/jquery.min.js"></script> <div class="test">blah</div> <div class="#test">blah</div>
Tests:
Vanilla JS ID test
document.querySelector('#test').classList.add('fuck');
Vanilla JS Class test
document.querySelector('.test').classList.add('fuck');
jQuery ID Test
$('#test').addClass('fuck');
jQuery Class Test
$('.test').addClass('fuck');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Vanilla JS ID test
Vanilla JS Class test
jQuery ID Test
jQuery Class Test
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided JSON data represents two benchmark definitions: one for jQuery 3.6.0 and four individual test cases. **Benchmark Definition (jQuery 3.6.0)** The provided JSON defines a benchmark setup with the following elements: * A script tag that loads the jQuery 3.6.0 library from an external URL. * An HTML string that contains two div elements: one with the class "test" and another with the ID "#test". This setup is used to execute the individual test cases, allowing users to compare the performance of different JavaScript approaches. **Individual Test Cases** The four individual test cases are: 1. **Vanilla JS ID test**: This test case uses Vanilla JavaScript (i.e., without any libraries or frameworks) to select an element by its ID and add a class. 2. **Vanilla JS Class test**: This test case also uses Vanilla JavaScript, but this time it selects an element by its class name and adds a class. 3. **jQuery ID Test**: This test case uses jQuery to select the element with the ID "#test" and add a class. 4. **jQuery Class Test**: Similar to the previous test case, this one uses jQuery to select the element with the class "test" and add a class. **Comparison of Options** The provided benchmark setup allows users to compare different approaches for executing these test cases: * **Vanilla JS ID and Class tests**: These tests use native JavaScript functionality without any libraries or frameworks. The performance of this approach is likely optimal, but it may not be representative of real-world scenarios where jQuery is used. * **jQuery ID and Class tests**: These tests use the jQuery library to execute the test cases. This allows users to compare the performance of using a popular JavaScript framework versus native JavaScript. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Vanilla JS ID and Class tests**: + Pros: Fast execution, optimal for native JavaScript. + Cons: May not be representative of real-world scenarios where jQuery is used. * **jQuery ID and Class tests**: + Pros: More representative of real-world scenarios where jQuery is used. + Cons: May introduce additional overhead due to the use of a library. **Library (jQuery)** The provided JSON mentions that jQuery 3.6.0 is used in two of the test cases. jQuery is a popular JavaScript framework that provides a lot of functionality for DOM manipulation, event handling, and more. In this context, it's likely being used to simplify the execution of the test cases by providing a convenient API for working with elements. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None of the provided benchmark setups use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is typically available in modern browsers. **Other Alternatives** There are other alternatives to using MeasureThat.net, such as: * **Benchmarking libraries**: There are several benchmarking libraries available for JavaScript, such as Benchmark.js, which provide a way to measure the performance of specific code snippets. * **Custom benchmark scripts**: Users can write their own custom benchmark scripts using a framework like Jest or Mocha. * **Other online platforms**: There are other online platforms that offer similar benchmarking capabilities, such as JSPerf.
Related benchmarks:
jQuery 3.6.0 vs Vanilla JS
Compare jQuery 3.6.0 vs 3.2.1 performance
Compare jQuery 3.6.1 vs. 3.2.1 Performance
jquery3.6.0 vs jquery3.7.0
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?