Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
testing
(version: 0)
test
Comparing performance of:
1st vs 2nd
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
1st
a=(Math.floor(15/10.2)+15)*2;
2nd
a=(Math.floor(15>>3.35)+15)*2;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
1st
2nd
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll explain the benchmarking process and options being compared. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a simple JavaScript microbenchmark test case, where two identical tests are run on different inputs to compare their performance. The test cases use basic arithmetic operations (division, multiplication, and bitwise shift). **Options Being Compared** Two primary approaches are being compared: 1. **Division with decimal numbers**: `a = Math.floor(15/10.2) + 15 * 2` * Pros: This approach is straightforward and easy to understand. * Cons: Division by a non-integer number can lead to precision issues, which might affect performance. 2. **Bitwise shift**: `a = (Math.floor(15 >> 3.35)) + 15 * 2` * Pros: Bitwise operations are typically faster than arithmetic operations due to their lower overhead and direct access to hardware registers. * Cons: The use of a fractional exponent (`3.35`) is non-standard and may not be supported by all browsers or platforms. **Library Usage** The test case uses the built-in `Math` library, which provides basic mathematical functions such as floor(), division, and bitwise shift. **Special JavaScript Features/Syntax** Neither of the tested approaches utilizes any special JavaScript features or syntax. They are straightforward arithmetic expressions that can be easily understood by most developers. **Other Considerations** * The use of fractional exponents in the bitwise shift operation might lead to unexpected behavior on platforms that don't support it. * The `Math.floor()` function is used to truncate the division result, which could affect performance if not done carefully. **Alternative Approaches** Other alternatives for measuring JavaScript performance include: 1. V8 or SpiderMonkey Profiling: These tools provide detailed information about CPU cycles and memory allocations within your code. 2. Chakra Profiler (for Edge): Similar to V8 profiling, but tailored for Microsoft's Edge browser engine. 3. Node.js built-in benchmarking module: Provides a simple way to measure performance using the `benchmark` function. Keep in mind that these alternatives might require more setup and configuration than running a simple JavaScript microbenchmark like this one.
Related benchmarks:
more vs not equal
test of equals
!= vs >= war
Comparison benchmark <= vs < vs ==
ehandling
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?