Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Updating innerHTML
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
innerHTML vs innerText vs textContent vs value
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id='div'></div> <textarea id='textarea'></textarea>
Tests:
innerHTML
document.getElementById("div").innerHTML+="abcdefghijk";
innerText
document.getElementById("div").innerText+="abcdefghijk";
textContent
document.getElementById("div").textContent+="abcdefghijk";
value
document.getElementById("textarea").value+="abcdefghijk";
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
innerHTML
innerText
textContent
value
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the Benchmark Definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark, where users can create and run their own benchmarks. The key aspects of this benchmark are: * **Script Preparation Code**: This is empty in the given example, which means no script needs to be executed before running the tests. * **Html Preparation Code**: This code generates an HTML structure with two elements: a `div` and a `textarea`. These elements will serve as targets for the benchmarked operations. **Individual Test Cases** The test cases are designed to measure the performance of different JavaScript methods for updating the content of these HTML elements. The methods being compared are: 1. **innerHTML**: This method is used to update the inner HTML content of an element. 2. **innerText**: This method is used to update the inner text content of an element. 3. **textContent**: This method is used to update the text content of an element. **Options Being Compared** The options being compared are: * Using `innerHTML` vs. using `innerText` * Using `innerHTML` with a string concatenation (`+`) vs. using `innerText` **Pros and Cons** * **innerHTML**: * Pros: It provides more flexibility in updating the HTML content, as it allows for adding HTML structure. * Cons: It can be slower than other methods due to DOM manipulation and parsing. * **innerText**: * Pros: It is generally faster than `innerHTML` because it only updates text content without changing the HTML structure. * Cons: It may not provide as much flexibility as `innerHTML`, especially when dealing with complex HTML structures. **Library Used** There doesn't appear to be a library explicitly mentioned in this benchmark, but some libraries like jQuery might be used implicitly due to their DOM manipulation capabilities. However, no explicit library dependencies are specified in the provided code. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There is one notable JavaScript feature being tested: string concatenation using `+`. While not exclusive to this benchmark, it's an essential part of JavaScript and can impact performance when dealing with large strings. **Other Alternatives** Alternative approaches for updating HTML content include: * Using a template engine like Handlebars or Pug * Utilizing a DOM manipulation library such as jQuery or React * Employing a string building method, such as using `Array.prototype.push` or `String.prototype +=` However, the current benchmark focuses on comparing the performance of basic methods (`innerHTML`, `innerText`, and `textContent`) with a focus on string concatenation.
Related benchmarks:
MarkTest1
MarkTest11
Input vs Textarea large text
DIV.innerHTML vs TEXTAREA.value
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?