Benchmark: DIV.innerHTML vs TEXTAREA.value

Tests:

DIV
const el = document.createElement('div'); for (var i = 0; i < 999; i++) { el.innerHTML += i }
TEXTAREA
const el = document.createElement('textarea'); for (var i = 0; i < 999; i++) { el.value += i }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
DIV
TEXTAREA

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 136 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
DIV	177.9 Ops/sec
TEXTAREA	361.2 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents two individual test cases, each testing the performance of creating and updating the `innerHTML` property of a `div` element versus the `value` property of a `textarea` element. The benchmark measures how many times these operations can be executed per second (executions per second) in different browsers.

**Options compared**

There are two options being compared:

1. **DIV.innerHTML**: This option tests the performance of setting the `innerHTML` property of a `div` element.
2. **TEXTAREA.value**: This option tests the performance of setting the `value` property of a `textarea` element.

**Pros and Cons of each approach**

**DIV.innerHTML:**

Pros:

* More expressive, as it allows for adding multiple elements or content
* Can be more efficient if you're only updating a small portion of the content

Cons:

* Can lead to slower performance if too much content is added
* Requires more DOM manipulations (e.g., creating new elements)

**TEXTAREA.value:**

Pros:

* More straightforward, as it's just appending text
* Less DOM manipulation required

Cons:

* May be less efficient due to the need to concatenate strings
* Limited to adding a single line of text at a time

**Library usage**

There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, if you're using a library like jQuery or a framework like React, it might be worth noting that these libraries can affect the performance of DOM manipulations.

**Special JS features or syntax**

The benchmark doesn't appear to use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's required for creating and updating the `innerHTML` and `value` properties. If you're interested in exploring other aspects of JavaScript performance, consider benchmarks that test more complex scenarios, such as asynchronous operations or functional programming.

**Other alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to measuring JavaScript performance, consider the following:

1. **Benchmarking frameworks**: Tools like Benchmark.js, Benchmark-Runner, or js-benchmark provide a structured approach to benchmarking JavaScript code.
2. **Performance metrics**: Consider using other performance metrics, such as First Contentful Paint (FCP), Load Time, or Time To Interactive (TTI), depending on your use case.
3. **WebAssembly benchmarks**: If you're working with WebAssembly (WASM) or are interested in comparing WASM vs JavaScript performance, there are dedicated benchmarking frameworks like Wasmer or SWAN.

Keep in mind that different benchmarks may yield different results due to various factors, such as browser version, platform, and execution environment.

Related benchmarks:

DIV.innerHTML vs TEXTAREA.value (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: DIV vs TEXTAREA

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

DIV

TEXTAREA

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):