Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Date vs new Date
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
new Date vs Date
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
new Date
new Date();
Date
Date();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
new Date
Date
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmarking test and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **What is being tested?** The benchmark is comparing two JavaScript functions: `new Date()` and `Date()`. The tests are designed to measure the performance of these two functions on a variety of devices (in this case, an Opera Mobile 64 device running Android 10). **Options compared** There are only two options being compared: 1. **`new Date()`**: This function creates a new date object using the current time and a set of predefined rules. 2. **`Date()`**: This is not a standard JavaScript function (it's actually a typo or a misprint, as `Date` is an existing constructor). It's possible that this represents a custom implementation or a library function. **Pros and Cons** * **`new Date()`**: + Pros: widely supported, fast, and efficient. + Cons: may not provide the most accurate date representation, especially for edge cases like leap seconds. * **Custom `Date()` function (assuming it exists)**: + Pros: potentially provides more accurate or customized date representations. + Cons: likely not widely supported, may be slower or less efficient. **Library usage** Neither of the two functions is using a library. However, if we assume that there's a custom implementation of `Date()` using some library, it could be something like: * A polyfill for older browsers or environments. * A specialized date library for a specific use case (e.g., scientific or financial applications). * A custom implementation for performance or accuracy reasons. **Special JavaScript feature** There are no special features mentioned in the benchmarking test. However, it's worth noting that `new Date()` and `Date()` both rely on the global `Date` object, which is a standard part of the JavaScript API. **Other alternatives** If you were to recreate this benchmark or choose an alternative approach, some options could include: * Using a different date library (e.g., moment.js) for more accurate or flexible date representation. * Implementing a custom date function using a different algorithm or data structure. * Comparing performance with other JavaScript functions that create dates in different ways (e.g., `Date.now()`). * Adding more test cases to cover edge cases, such as time zones or daylight saving. In summary, the benchmark is testing the performance of two common JavaScript functions for creating date objects: `new Date()` and a custom `Date()` function. The comparison highlights the pros and cons of each approach, with `new Date()` providing fast but potentially less accurate results.
Related benchmarks:
Date.now(); vs new Date()
new Date from UNIX timestamp (ms) vs new Date from ISO string
Date() vs Date(YY,MM,DD,hh,mm)
Date.now() - Date.now() vs new Date() - new Date()
Date comparison Date.now vs new Date
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?