Benchmark: Jquery versions Benchmarch (+3.6.0)

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="idSelector"></div>
<div class="classSelector"></div>
<ul id="iteration">
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
</ul>
<div id="cssGetter" style="color: black;"></div>
<div id="cssSetter" style="color: black;"></div>
<div id="find">
    <span></span>
    <div>
        <strong></strong>
    </div>
</div>

<script type="text/javascript" src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.3/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq18 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>

<script type="text/javascript" src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.1/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq19 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>

<script type="text/javascript" src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq112 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.2.1/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq321 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.0/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq360 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
  // Filter Next
  $('#iteration li').filter(':first').next();
  
  // Filter Prev
  $('#iteration li').filter(':last').prev();
  
  // Non-existant Class
  $('.someClass');
  
  // Non-existant ID
  $('#someID');
  
  // Find
  $('#find').find('strong');
  
  // Set color
  $('#cssSetter').css('color', 'red');
  
  // Get color
  $('#cssGetter').css('color');
  
  // Iteration
  $('#iteration li').each(function(i, e) {
    i++;
  });
  
  // Class selector
  $('.classSelector');
  
  // ID selector
  $('#idSelector');
}

Tests:

1.8.3
tests($jq18);
1.9.1
tests($jq18);
1.12.14
tests($jq112);
2.2.4
tests($jq224);
3.2.1
tests($jq321);
3.6.0
tests($jq360);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
1.8.3
1.9.1
1.12.14
2.2.4
3.2.1
3.6.0

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros/cons.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is a JavaScript microbenchmark that tests various aspects of jQuery functionality. The `tests($jqX)` function takes a jQuery version (`$jqX`) as an argument and executes a series of operations on it. These operations include:

1. Filtering the first or last element in a list.
2. Attempting to access a non-existent class or ID.
3. Finding a specific element within another element.
4. Setting or getting the color of an element's CSS style.
5. Iterating over a list using `each()`.

**Library and Its Purpose**

The primary library being tested is jQuery, which is a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation and event handling. In this benchmark, various versions of jQuery are tested to compare their performance in executing these operations.

**Comparison of jQuery Versions**

The benchmark compares the performance of different jQuery versions:

* `3.6.0` (latest version at the time of writing)
* `3.2.1`
* `2.2.4`
* `1.12.14`
* `1.9.1`
* `1.8.3`

**What's Being Compared?**

The benchmark is comparing the performance of each jQuery version in executing a series of operations within the `tests($jqX)` function. The results are measured by the number of executions per second (ExecutionsPerSecond) for each browser and device platform.

**Pros/Cons of Each Version**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each jQuery version:

* **3.6.0**: This is the latest version, but it may not be widely supported by older browsers.
	+ Pros: Optimized performance, new features.
	+ Cons: May require more modern hardware and browser support.
* **3.2.1**: An older version that still receives updates and has good browser support.
	+ Pros: Still widely supported, relatively lightweight.
	+ Cons: Not as optimized for performance as newer versions.
* **2.2.4**: An even older version with less optimization and fewer features compared to the latest versions.
	+ Pros: Very lightweight, may be suitable for very old browsers or embedded systems.
	+ Cons: Limited functionality, poor performance.
* **1.12.14** and **1.9.1**: Older versions that are still widely used but not as actively maintained.
	+ Pros: Still supported by some older browsers, relatively stable.
	+ Cons: Less optimized for performance, fewer features.

Keep in mind that this is a simplified analysis, and the actual performance differences between these versions may vary depending on specific use cases and hardware configurations.

Related benchmarks:

Jquery versions Benchmarch (+3.6.0) (version: 0)

SImple benchmark of jQuery versions

Comparing performance of: 1.8.3 vs 1.9.1 vs 1.12.14 vs 2.2.4 vs 3.2.1 vs 3.6.0

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

1.8.3

1.9.1

1.12.14

2.2.4

3.2.1

3.6.0

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):