Benchmark: Jquery versions Benchmark 3.1.1 vs 3.4.1

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="idSelector"></div>
<div class="classSelector"></div>
<ul id="iteration">
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
</ul>
<div id="cssGetter" style="color: black;"></div>
<div id="cssSetter" style="color: black;"></div>
<div id="find">
    <span></span>
    <div>
        <strong></strong>
    </div>
</div>

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq311 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.4.1/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq341 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
  // Filter Next
  $('#iteration li').filter(':first').next();
  
  // Filter Prev
  $('#iteration li').filter(':last').prev();
  
  // Non-existant Class
  $('.someClass');
  
  // Non-existant ID
  $('#someID');
  
  // Find
  $('#find').find('strong');
  
  // Set color
  $('#cssSetter').css('color', 'red');
  
  // Get color
  $('#cssGetter').css('color');
  
  // Iteration
  $('#iteration li').each(function(i, e) {
    i++;
  });
  
  // Class selector
  $('.classSelector');
  
  // ID selector
  $('#idSelector');
}

Tests:

3.1.1
tests($jq311);
3.4.1
tests($jq341);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
3.1.1
3.4.1

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/141.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 141 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
3.1.1	15396.2 Ops/sec
3.4.1	15328.6 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript benchmarks.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark, specifically testing two versions of jQuery: 3.1.1 and 3.4.1. The benchmark measures how quickly each version executes a series of functions that interact with HTML elements on a webpage.

**Options compared:**

The benchmark compares the performance of two different approaches to accessing and manipulating HTML elements:

1. **Direct DOM access**: Using methods like `$('#idSelector')` or `.classSelector()` to directly access elements.
2. **jQuery's $() function**: Using jQuery's `$()` function to select and manipulate elements.

**Pros and Cons:**

* Direct DOM access:
	+ Pros: Can be faster, as it avoids the overhead of a library like jQuery.
	+ Cons: Requires more manual memory management and can lead to errors if not done correctly.
* jQuery's $() function:
	+ Pros: Provides a simpler and more convenient way to interact with elements, reducing the risk of errors.
	+ Cons: Can be slower due to the overhead of the library.

**Library usage:**

In this benchmark, jQuery is used in two different versions (3.1.1 and 3.4.1). The `$()` function is used to select and manipulate elements. Additionally, `$.noConflict(true)` is used to prevent conflicts between multiple versions of jQuery on the same page.

**Special JS features or syntax:**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. It's a straightforward comparison of two library-based approaches.

**Other considerations:**

* The benchmark assumes that the HTML elements exist and are properly loaded before execution.
* The benchmark does not account for other factors like page loading time, network latency, or device-specific differences.

**Alternative approaches:**

If you want to create your own JavaScript benchmarks, here are some alternatives:

1. **V8 Benchmark**: A popular benchmarking suite for JavaScript engines, including V8 (used by Chrome).
2. **Benchmark.js**: A lightweight and flexible benchmarking library for JavaScript.
3. **JSPerf**: A tool for creating and running JavaScript performance benchmarks.

When creating your own benchmarks, consider the following:

* Keep it simple and focused on a specific use case or feature.
* Use a consistent testing environment to minimize variations.
* Measure relevant metrics, such as execution time, memory usage, or throughput.
* Consider using benchmarking libraries like Benchmark.js or JSPerf to simplify the process.

Related benchmarks:

Jquery versions Benchmark 3.1.1 vs 3.4.1 (version: 0)

Simple benchmark of jQuery versions

Comparing performance of: 3.1.1 vs 3.4.1

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

3.1.1

3.4.1

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):