Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
regexp test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
c1 vs c2
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var regexp1 = new RegExp("(.*(/v[1-4])?)/harmonogram", "i"); var regexp2 = new RegExp("(.*)/harmonogram", "i");
Tests:
c1
regexp1.test("localhost/harmonogram")
c2
regexp2.test("localhost/harmonogram")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
c1
c2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition JSON:** The provided JSON defines two JavaScript benchmarks: * `regexp1` and `regexp2`: These are regular expression objects created using the `RegExp` constructor. The first one has a more specific pattern (`(.*(/v[1-4])?)/harmonogram`) with an optional group, while the second one has a simpler pattern (`(.*)/harmonogram`). Both patterns match the string `/harmonogram` in a case-insensitive manner (indicated by the `i` flag). **Options Compared:** The two benchmarks compare the performance of regular expression matching with different levels of specificity: * `regexp1`: A more specific regular expression pattern that captures additional information (`/v[1-4]`) before matching the `/harmonogram` string. * `regexp2`: A simpler, less specific regular expression pattern that only matches the `/harmonogram` string without capturing any additional information. **Pros and Cons:** The choice between these two approaches depends on the use case: * **Specificity:** If you need to extract more data from the matched string (e.g., version information), using `regexp1` might be beneficial. However, this comes at the cost of increased complexity and potentially slower performance. * **Simplicity:** Using `regexp2` is simpler and may result in faster execution times for matching only the `/harmonogram` string. However, it may not provide as much useful data from the match. **Library Usage:** There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. The `RegExp` constructor is a built-in JavaScript function used to create regular expression objects. **Special JS Features/Syntax:** The benchmark definition does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would require additional explanation. **Other Alternatives:** If you need to compare different regular expression patterns, alternatives could include: * Using a library like `jsregex` or `regex-ast`, which provide more advanced regular expression capabilities and possibly improved performance. * Implementing custom regular expression engines or optimizing existing ones for specific use cases. Keep in mind that the choice of alternative approaches depends on your specific requirements, such as performance, complexity, and desired features.
Related benchmarks:
Various regex testing patterns
regex.test vs regex.match
new RegExp test 2
regex test do star
parseFloat isNaN vs RegEx parseFloat
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?