Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
regex.test vs regex.match
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
match vs test
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = "22/07/2019 13:36:26"; var regex = /(\d{2})-(\d{2})-(\d{4}).*/;
Tests:
match
str.match(regex);
test
regex.test(str);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
match
test
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark test and explain what's being tested, compared, and analyzed. **Benchmark Test Overview** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares the performance of two regular expression (regex) methods: `regex.test()` and `str.match(regex)`. **Tested Options** There are only two options being compared: 1. `regex.test(str)` 2. `str.match(regex)` **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Both approaches use regex to extract a specific pattern from a string, but they differ in their syntax and behavior. * `regex.test(str)`: + Pros: Simple and concise syntax. + Cons: May not be as efficient as other methods, as it doesn't return the actual match data. * `str.match(regex)`: (Note: This is a deprecated method. It's recommended to use `str.match()` without the parentheses.) + Pros: Returns the entire matched string, which can be useful in some cases. + Cons: May not work correctly for multi-line regex patterns or when the pattern doesn't match at all. **Library and Purpose** In this benchmark, no specific JavaScript library is used. The regex engine is built into the browser's JavaScript interpreter. **Special JS Features or Syntax** No special JavaScript features or syntax are mentioned in this benchmark. **Alternatives** If you need to compare performance of different regex methods, here are some alternatives: * Use a dedicated regex testing framework, like `regex-test` (npm package). * Implement custom timing functions using Web Workers or async/await. * Compare performance using a more comprehensive benchmarking library, like `benchmarkjs`. Keep in mind that this specific benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two specific regex methods. Depending on your use case, you might want to explore other approaches for measuring regex performance. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The provided script preparation code creates a sample string `str` and defines a regex pattern `regex`. The HTML preparation code is empty (no HTML is involved in this benchmark). Overall, this benchmark tests the relative performance of two common regex methods in JavaScript. By analyzing the results, developers can gain insights into which approach to use depending on their specific requirements.
Related benchmarks:
split vs replace
split vs replace v2
split1 vs regex
RegEx.exec vs StrRaasdhakshjding.match
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?