Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
dayjs locale load 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
one vs two
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
one
const locale = { name: 'sv', weekdays: 'söndag_måndag_tisdag_onsdag_torsdag_fredag_lördag'.split('_'), weekdaysShort: 'sön_mån_tis_ons_tor_fre_lör'.split('_'), weekdaysMin: 'sö_må_ti_on_to_fr_lö'.split('_'), months: 'januari_februari_mars_april_maj_juni_juli_augusti_september_oktober_november_december'.split('_'), monthsShort: 'jan_feb_mar_apr_maj_jun_jul_aug_sep_okt_nov_dec'.split('_'), weekStart: 1, yearStart: 4, ordinal: (n) => { const b = n % 10 const o = (b === 1) || (b === 2) ? 'a' : 'e' return `[${n}${o}]` }, formats: { LT: 'HH:mm', LTS: 'HH:mm:ss', L: 'YYYY-MM-DD', LL: 'D MMMM YYYY', LLL: 'D MMMM YYYY [kl.] HH:mm', LLLL: 'dddd D MMMM YYYY [kl.] HH:mm', lll: 'D MMM YYYY HH:mm', llll: 'ddd D MMM YYYY HH:mm' }, relativeTime: { future: 'om %s', past: 'för %s sedan', s: 'några sekunder', m: 'en minut', mm: '%d minuter', h: 'en timme', hh: '%d timmar', d: 'en dag', dd: '%d dagar', M: 'en månad', MM: '%d månader', y: 'ett år', yy: '%d år' } }
two
JSON.parse('{"name":"sv","weekdays":["söndag","måndag","tisdag","onsdag","torsdag","fredag","lördag"],"weekdaysShort":["sön","mån","tis","ons","tor","fre","lör"],"weekdaysMin":["sö","må","ti","on","to","fr","lö"],"months":["januari","februari","mars","april","maj","juni","juli","augusti","september","oktober","november","december"],"monthsShort":["jan","feb","mar","apr","maj","jun","jul","aug","sep","okt","nov","dec"],"weekStart":1,"yearStart":4,"formats":{"LT":"HH:mm","LTS":"HH:mm:ss","L":"YYYY-MM-DD","LL":"D MMMM YYYY","LLL":"D MMMM YYYY [kl.] HH:mm","LLLL":"dddd D MMMM YYYY [kl.] HH:mm","lll":"D MMM YYYY HH:mm","llll":"ddd D MMM YYYY HH:mm"},"relativeTime":{"future":"om %s","past":"för %s sedan","s":"några sekunder","m":"en minut","mm":"%d minuter","h":"en timme","hh":"%d timmar","d":"en dag","dd":"%d dagar","M":"en månad","MM":"%d månader","y":"ett år","yy":"%d år"}}')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
one
two
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll dive into explaining the provided benchmark and its related concepts. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition for testing the dayjs library, specifically its locale loading functionality. The `dayjs` library is a popular JavaScript date manipulation library that provides various features such as date formatting, parsing, and relative time calculations. **Options Compared** In this benchmark, two test cases are compared: 1. **Test Case 1: "one"** This test case loads the Swedish locale using the `const locale = { ... }` syntax. 2. **Test Case 2: "two"** This test case parses a JSON string containing the Swedish locale data using the `JSON.parse()` method. **Options Analysis** There are two main approaches being compared in this benchmark: 1. **Dynamic Locale Loading**: The first test case loads the locale dynamically using JavaScript syntax (e.g., `const locale = { ... }`). This approach is often preferred when working with dynamic or user-inputted data. 2. **Static JSON Parsing**: The second test case parses a static JSON string containing the locale data using the `JSON.parse()` method. This approach is typically used for pre-configured or hardcoded data. **Pros and Cons** **Dynamic Locale Loading (Test Case 1)** Pros: * Can handle dynamic or user-inputted data * Allows for more flexible configuration options * May be faster due to reduced JSON parsing overhead Cons: * Requires JavaScript syntax knowledge * May lead to slower performance if not optimized correctly **Static JSON Parsing (Test Case 2)** Pros: * Faster performance due to reduced JavaScript overhead * Easier to optimize and improve performance * Typically uses less memory Cons: * Limited flexibility for dynamic or user-inputted data * Requires manual JSON configuration management **Library: dayjs** The `dayjs` library is a popular JavaScript date manipulation library that provides various features such as date formatting, parsing, and relative time calculations. The provided benchmark tests the locale loading functionality of this library. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax** There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark, apart from the use of `JSON.parse()` method which is a standard JavaScript feature for parsing JSON data. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative libraries or approaches for date manipulation and locale loading, here are some options: * **Moment.js**: A popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times. While not as lightweight as dayjs, it offers more features and customization options. * **Luxon**: A modern JavaScript library for working with dates and times. Offers high-performance and flexibility options. Keep in mind that the choice of library or approach depends on your specific requirements, performance needs, and personal preferences.
Related benchmarks:
Date.toLocaleDateString with options
locale
Moment Dayjs format benchmark
Date vs Dayjs
Date vs Dayjs.utc() vs Dayjs().utc()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?