Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Date.toLocaleDateString with options
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
with locale vs without locale
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
with locale
const x = new Date().toLocaleDateString('en-US');
without locale
const x = new Date().toLocaleDateString();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
with locale
without locale
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation. **What is being tested?** The benchmark tests two different approaches to formatting dates using JavaScript's `Date.toLocaleDateString()` method. The goal is to measure how long it takes to execute these methods on a given device. **What options are compared?** There are two test cases: 1. **"with locale"**: This case passes the string `'en-US'` as an argument to `toLocaleDateString()`. In JavaScript, this string represents a locale (a language and region combination). The method uses this information to format the date accordingly. 2. **"without locale"**: This case omits the locale string, passing no arguments to `toLocaleDateString()`. **Pros/Cons of different approaches:** The main difference between these two approaches is how the date is formatted: * In the "with locale" case, the date is formatted according to the `'en-US'` locale, which might include formatting specific details like day/month order, time zone, and so on. * In the "without locale" case, the date is formatted using the default locale settings of the system or the browser. The pros and cons are: * **With locale**: + Pros: more accurate and consistent date formatting across different devices and systems. + Cons: might be slower due to additional processing required for formatting according to a specific locale. * **Without locale**: + Pros: potentially faster execution since it uses the default locale settings, which are often pre-computed. + Cons: date formatting might vary depending on the device or system used. **What library is used?** No specific libraries are mentioned in this benchmark definition. The `Date` object and its methods are part of the JavaScript built-in API. **Special JS feature or syntax used?** None, apart from the use of template literals (`const x = new Date().toLocaleDateString('en-US');`) which is a standard JavaScript feature. **Other alternatives:** If you need to format dates in your application: * Consider using a dedicated date formatting library like Moment.js (discontinued) or Day.js (its successor). * If not using libraries, stick with the "with locale" approach for more consistent and accurate date formatting across different devices and systems. * If performance is critical and consistency is not a top priority, you could use the "without locale" approach, but be aware that date formatting might vary depending on the device or system used. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
Date.toLocaleDateString with options
Date.toLocaleDateString
locale
DateTimeFormat vs toLocaleDateString 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?