Benchmark: dayjs locale load

Tests:

one
const locale = { name: 'sv', weekdays: 'söndag_måndag_tisdag_onsdag_torsdag_fredag_lördag'.split('_'), weekdaysShort: 'sön_mån_tis_ons_tor_fre_lör'.split('_'), weekdaysMin: 'sö_må_ti_on_to_fr_lö'.split('_'), months: 'januari_februari_mars_april_maj_juni_juli_augusti_september_oktober_november_december'.split('_'), monthsShort: 'jan_feb_mar_apr_maj_jun_jul_aug_sep_okt_nov_dec'.split('_'), weekStart: 1, yearStart: 4, ordinal: (n) => { const b = n % 10 const o = (b === 1) || (b === 2) ? 'a' : 'e' return `[${n}${o}]` }, formats: { LT: 'HH:mm', LTS: 'HH:mm:ss', L: 'YYYY-MM-DD', LL: 'D MMMM YYYY', LLL: 'D MMMM YYYY [kl.] HH:mm', LLLL: 'dddd D MMMM YYYY [kl.] HH:mm', lll: 'D MMM YYYY HH:mm', llll: 'ddd D MMM YYYY HH:mm' }, relativeTime: { future: 'om %s', past: 'för %s sedan', s: 'några sekunder', m: 'en minut', mm: '%d minuter', h: 'en timme', hh: '%d timmar', d: 'en dag', dd: '%d dagar', M: 'en månad', MM: '%d månader', y: 'ett år', yy: '%d år' } }
two
JSON.stringify('{"name":"sv","weekdays":["söndag","måndag","tisdag","onsdag","torsdag","fredag","lördag"],"weekdaysShort":["sön","mån","tis","ons","tor","fre","lör"],"weekdaysMin":["sö","må","ti","on","to","fr","lö"],"months":["januari","februari","mars","april","maj","juni","juli","augusti","september","oktober","november","december"],"monthsShort":["jan","feb","mar","apr","maj","jun","jul","aug","sep","okt","nov","dec"],"weekStart":1,"yearStart":4,"formats":{"LT":"HH:mm","LTS":"HH:mm:ss","L":"YYYY-MM-DD","LL":"D MMMM YYYY","LLL":"D MMMM YYYY [kl.] HH:mm","LLLL":"dddd D MMMM YYYY [kl.] HH:mm","lll":"D MMM YYYY HH:mm","llll":"ddd D MMM YYYY HH:mm"},"relativeTime":{"future":"om %s","past":"för %s sedan","s":"några sekunder","m":"en minut","mm":"%d minuter","h":"en timme","hh":"%d timmar","d":"en dag","dd":"%d dagar","M":"en månad","MM":"%d månader","y":"ett år","yy":"%d år"}}')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
one
two

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided benchmark definition is a JSON object that defines the test case for measuring performance. The key components are:

1. `Name`: A unique name for the benchmark (in this case, "dayjs locale load").
2. `Description`: An optional description of the benchmark, which is empty in this case.
3. `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These fields are left blank, indicating that no custom script or HTML code needs to be executed before running the test.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are two individual test cases defined:

1. **Test Case 1 (one)**

The benchmark definition for this test case is a JavaScript object that represents the locale configuration for the dayjs library. The object includes various properties, such as `weekdays`, `weekdaysShort`, `weekdaysMin`, `months`, and `formats`. These properties define how the dates should be formatted.

2. **Test Case 2 (two)**

This test case is similar to Test Case 1, but it uses a different format for stringifying the locale configuration object.

**Library: dayjs**

The dayjs library is used in both test cases. Dayjs is a popular JavaScript date and time formatting library that provides an easy-to-use API for working with dates and times.

In the context of this benchmark, dayjs is used to generate formatted strings based on the provided locale configuration.

**Options Compared**

When running these tests, MeasureThat.net compares two different approaches:

1. **Direct Stringification**: The first test case (one) uses direct stringification of the locale configuration object.
2. **JSON.stringify()**: The second test case (two) uses JSON.stringify() to serialize the locale configuration object before generating the formatted strings.

**Pros and Cons**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:

1. **Direct Stringification**
	* Pros: May be faster since it doesn't require an additional stringification step.
	* Cons: Can lead to more complex code and potential issues with Unicode characters or non-ASCII strings.
2. **JSON.stringify()**
	* Pros: Provides a standardized way of serializing objects, which can make the code easier to read and maintain. It also handles Unicode characters and non-ASCII strings correctly.
	* Cons: May introduce additional overhead due to the stringification step.

**Other Considerations**

When working with date and time formatting libraries like dayjs, it's essential to consider factors such as:

1. **Performance**: Measuring performance is crucial when benchmarking JavaScript code.
2. **Code Readability**: Using a standardized way of serializing objects, like JSON.stringify(), can make the code easier to read and maintain.
3. **Unicode Support**: Ensuring that the library handles Unicode characters and non-ASCII strings correctly is essential for supporting diverse user bases.

**Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative libraries or approaches for date and time formatting, some popular options include:

1. **Moment.js**: A widely-used JavaScript date and time library that provides a similar API to dayjs.
2. **Luxon**: A modern JavaScript date and time library that offers advanced features like timezone support and precise calculations.

Keep in mind that each library has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific use case and requirements.

Related benchmarks:

dayjs locale load (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: one vs two

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

one

two

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):