Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
trim-loadsh vs native-trim1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
trim lodash vs native trim
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var test = " abc a testing ";
Tests:
trim lodash
_.trim(test);
native trim
test.trim();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
trim lodash
native trim
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents a benchmark test between two approaches to trim whitespace from a string: `_.trim()` (a function from the Lodash library) and the native `String.prototype.trim()` method in JavaScript. **Options compared:** Two options are compared: 1. **Lodash's `_trim()`**: A utility function that removes whitespace characters from both ends of a string. 2. **Native `String.prototype.trim()`**: The built-in JavaScript method for trimming whitespace from a string. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** * **Lodash's `_trim()`**: + Pros: - More efficient in some cases, especially when dealing with large strings or performance-critical code. - Often used in web development due to its popularity and versatility. + Cons: - Adds an extra dependency on the Lodash library, which may not be desirable for all projects. - May have a higher overhead due to the complexity of the implementation. * **Native `String.prototype.trim()`**: + Pros: - No additional dependencies or overhead. - Fast and efficient since it's a built-in method. + Cons: - May not be as flexible or customizable as Lodash's `_trim()`. - May have performance issues with very large input strings. **Library:** The `lodash` library is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks such as string manipulation, array processing, and more. In this benchmark, the `_trim()` function is used to demonstrate Lodash's trimming functionality. **Special JS feature or syntax:** There are no special features or syntax mentioned in the provided JSON. The code uses standard JavaScript syntax for string trimming. **Other alternatives:** For string trimming in JavaScript, other alternatives exist besides the two options being compared: * Using a regular expression to trim whitespace from both ends of a string. * Implementing a custom trimming function using `String.prototype.slice()` or `String.prototype.replace()`. * Utilizing other utility libraries like StringAPI or trimmer functions. Keep in mind that the choice of which method to use often depends on performance, readability, and project requirements.
Related benchmarks:
trim vs _.trim
trim loadsh vs native trim
trim vs lodash/fp
trim-loadsh vs native-trim
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?