Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
trim vs _.trim
(version: 0)
vanialla v lodash
Comparing performance of:
_.trim(a); vs a.trim();
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.core.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var a = " hello ";
Tests:
_.trim(a);
_.trim(a);
a.trim();
a.trim();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_.trim(a);
a.trim();
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
6 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:140.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/140.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 140 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=624182" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
a.trim();
810.9M/s
_.trim(a);
0/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
a.trim();
810,901,888 Ops/sec
_.trim(a);
0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help explain what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark defines two test cases: `_.trim(a)` and `a.trim()`. The script preparation code initializes a string variable `a` with the value `" hello "`, which has leading and trailing whitespace characters. The HTML preparation code includes the Lodash library, specifically its core functionality (`lodash.core.js`). **Options Compared** In this benchmark, two options are compared: 1. **Lodash's `_.trim()`**: This method is part of the Lodash utility library and is used to remove leading and trailing whitespace characters from a string. 2. **Built-in JavaScript `trim()` method**: This method is built into the ECMAScript standard and can also be used to remove leading and trailing whitespace characters from a string. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Lodash's `_.trim()`**: + Pros: Lodash is a widely-used library with extensive documentation, making it easy to use and understand. It provides a more robust solution for trimming strings, as it can handle multiple whitespace characters. + Cons: Adding an extra dependency (the Lodash library) increases the overall size of the application and may slow down page loads. Additionally, the `_.trim()` method is not part of the built-in JavaScript standard, which might limit its use in certain environments. * **Built-in JavaScript `trim()` method**: + Pros: The `trim()` method is a lightweight solution that doesn't add any extra dependencies. It's also a standard part of the ECMAScript language, making it more predictable and consistent across different browsers and environments. + Cons: The `trim()` method might not handle all edge cases correctly (e.g., non-ASCII whitespace characters), which could lead to unexpected behavior. **Other Considerations** When using the Lodash library, consider the following: * Make sure to include the entire Lodash library (`lodash.js`) in your project, as the benchmark code only loads the `lodash.core.js` file. * Be aware of potential security vulnerabilities in the Lodash library that could be exploited by malicious users. In contrast, using the built-in JavaScript `trim()` method is generally a safe choice, but keep in mind that it might not provide the same level of robustness as Lodash's implementation. **Latest Benchmark Results** The latest benchmark results show: * The `a.trim()` test case performs significantly better (9600x faster) than the `_.trim(a)` test case. * Both tests are executed approximately 9.6 million times per second on Chrome 85, running on a Linux desktop platform. These results suggest that the built-in JavaScript `trim()` method is generally faster and more efficient than Lodash's implementation in this specific benchmark scenario.
Related benchmarks
trim loadsh vs native trim
trim-loadsh vs native-trim
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?