Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
1c123easd
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
lodash merge
var a = { a: {title: 'abrams', type: 'carrier'}, b: {title: 'USS Niphilim', type: 'Carrier' }}; var b = { b: {title: 'USS Nimitz', type: 'Carrier' } }; var c = _.merge(a, b);
object.assign
var a = { a: {title: 'abrams', type: 'carrier'}, b: {title: 'USS Niphilim', type: 'Carrier' }}; var b = { b: {title: 'USS Nimitz', type: 'Carrier' } }; var c = Object.assign(a, b);
spread
var a = { a: {title: 'abrams', type: 'carrier'}, b: {title: 'USS Niphilim', type: 'Carrier' }}; var b = { b: {title: 'USS Nimitz', type: 'Carrier' } }; var c = { ...a, ...b };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash merge
object.assign
spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark. **Overview** The benchmark is designed to test the performance of three different ways to merge two objects: `Object.assign()`, spread operator (`{ ... }`), and Lodash's `merge()` function. The benchmark compares these approaches to determine which one is the fastest. **Test Cases** Each test case consists of a script that defines two objects, `a` and `b`, and then calls either `Object.assign()`, spread operator, or Lodash's `merge()` function to merge these two objects into a new object `c`. The scripts are identical in terms of the input data, but differ only in how they perform the merging. **Options Compared** The three options compared in this benchmark are: 1. **`Object.assign()`**: This method takes two or more source objects and merges them into one destination object. 2. **Spread Operator (`{ ... }`)**: This operator creates a new object by spreading the properties of an existing object. 3. **Lodash's `merge()` function**: This function merges two objects into one, handling various edge cases such as overwriting existing keys. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons for each approach: 1. **`Object.assign()`**: * Pros: Simple, widely supported, and fast. * Cons: Can be slower than other approaches if the source objects have a large number of properties or deep structures. 2. **Spread Operator (`{ ... }`)**: * Pros: Fast, concise, and easy to read. * Cons: Only works in modern browsers that support ES6+ syntax. May not work in older browsers or environments with restricted features. 3. **Lodash's `merge()` function**: * Pros: Handles various edge cases such as overwriting existing keys, merging objects with circular references, and more. * Cons: Requires Lodash library to be included in the test script. **Library and Syntax** The benchmark uses the following libraries: 1. **Lodash**: A popular utility library that provides a `merge()` function for merging objects. 2. **Spread Operator (`{ ... }`)**: A modern JavaScript syntax for creating new objects from existing ones. No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in this benchmark, making it accessible to a wide range of developers. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches to merge two objects, consider the following: 1. **Object.create() and Object.assign()**: This approach creates a new object using `Object.create()` and then merges properties from another object using `Object.assign()`. 2. **Array.prototype.reduce()**: You can use `reduce()` method on an array of key-value pairs to merge objects. 3. **For...in loop**: A traditional approach using a `for...in` loop to iterate over the source objects' properties and create a new object. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as concise or efficient as the approaches tested in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Last Lodash Test
Lodash vs Ramda fromPairs
sanitize-html vs lodash
Equals vs underscore vs lodash part 2
lodash vs radash 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?