Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
math pow vs **
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
pow vs mult
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
pow
var x = Math.pow(54,2);
mult
var y = 54**2
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
pow
mult
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested in this benchmark. **What is being tested?** The benchmark measures the performance difference between two ways to calculate the square of a number: using the `Math.pow()` function or the exponentiation operator (`**`). In other words, the test compares how fast Chrome 92 can execute these two expressions: 1. `var x = Math.pow(54,2);` 2. `var y = 54**2` **Options compared** There are two main options being compared: 1. **Math.pow() function**: A built-in JavaScript method that takes two arguments: the base and the exponent. 2. **Exponentiation operator (`**`)**: A shorthand way to raise a number to a power. **Pros and cons of each approach** Here's a brief rundown of the advantages and disadvantages of each: * `Math.pow()` function: + Pros: Portable, widely supported across browsers and platforms. + Cons: May be slower due to method call overhead (although this difference is often negligible). * Exponentiation operator (`**`): + Pros: Faster, as it's a single operation instead of a separate method call. + Cons: Not supported in older browsers or environments that don't implement this syntax. **Other considerations** The benchmark doesn't account for other factors that might affect performance, such as: * CPU architecture (e.g., x86 vs. ARM) * Memory allocation and deallocation * Garbage collection frequency * Browser-specific optimizations **Library used in the test case** There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided code snippet. However, it's worth noting that MeasureThat.net typically uses a framework like **Benchmark.js**, which provides a simple way to create benchmarks. **Special JS feature or syntax** The exponentiation operator (`**`) is a relatively recent addition to JavaScript (introduced in ECMAScript 2016). While widely supported, some older browsers might not implement this syntax. However, since MeasureThat.net uses a modern browser (Chrome 92), this should be fully supported. In summary, the benchmark measures the performance difference between two ways to calculate the square of a number: using the `Math.pow()` function and the exponentiation operator (`**`). The results highlight the advantage of using the exponentiation operator for faster execution.
Related benchmarks:
pow vs exponentiation
Math.pow vs Exponentiation vs Multiplication
Math.pow vs Exponentiation vs Multiplication pow 4
math.pow vs multiply vs exponentiation
Leetcode Pow vs Math.pow syntax
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?