Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array spread operator vs push in reduce v2
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with push inside reduce
Comparing performance of:
spread operator vs Push
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
spread operator
var arr = [ { "opportunityId": 5943111, "findingList": [ { "findingId": 6919 } ], }, { "opportunityId": 5943111, "findingList": [ { "findingId": 6918, "findingId": 6917 } ] } ] arr.reduce((acc, findingInOpp) => [...acc, ...findingInOpp.findingList.map(({ findingId }) => findingId)],[])
Push
var arr = [ { "opportunityId": 5943111, "findingList": [ { "findingId": 6919 } ], }, { "opportunityId": 5943111, "findingList": [ { "findingId": 6918, "findingId": 6917 } ] } ] arr.reduce((acc, findingInOpp) => { findingInOpp.findingList.forEach(({ findingId }) => acc.push(findingId)) return acc },[])
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
spread operator
Push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for flattening an array of objects in JavaScript: using the `Array.prototype.reduce()` method with the spread operator (`...`) and pushing elements onto an accumulator array. The test measures which approach is faster, but we'll also explore the pros and cons of each approach. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two options: 1. **Push**: Using the `push()` method to add elements to an accumulator array in a loop. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: Using the spread operator to create a new array from an existing array or object, and then adding it to the accumulator array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** ### Push Pros: * Wide compatibility across different JavaScript engines and versions. * Simple to implement and understand. Cons: * Can be slower for large arrays due to the overhead of repeated `push()` calls. * May not be as efficient as using the spread operator, especially when dealing with large datasets. ### Spread Operator (`...`) Pros: * More concise and readable code. * Efficient for large datasets, as it avoids the overhead of repeated array mutations. * Native support in modern JavaScript engines. Cons: * May not work correctly in older JavaScript versions or certain browsers that don't support the spread operator. * Can be less intuitive to understand than using `push()`. **Library Usage** There are no libraries used in this benchmark. The test code only uses built-in JavaScript features and methods. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark uses the spread operator (`...`), which is a relatively new feature introduced in ES6 (2015). This syntax allows for more concise and expressive array manipulation, but may not be supported in older browsers or versions of JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to this benchmark, here are a few options: * Using `Array.prototype.concat()` instead of `push()`. * Implementing your own custom flattening function using loops and array mutations. * Utilizing libraries like Lodash or Ramda for more functional programming approaches. Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific requirements of your project, including performance, code readability, and compatibility with different JavaScript versions and browsers.
Related benchmarks:
ES6 spread operator vs. Array.prototype.reduce()
spread operator vs push test - correct
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator with length limit
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator on a bigger array
Array push vs spread when reducing over results
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?