Benchmark: decimal.js vs. native

HTML Preparation code:

<!--script src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iriscouch/bigdecimal.js/v0.6.1/lib/bigdecimal.js"></script-->
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/bignumber.js/9.0.1/bignumber.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/big.js/6.0.3/big.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/decimal.js/10.2.1/decimal.min.js"></script>
<!--script src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/infusion/Fraction.js/v4.0.12/fraction.min.js"></script-->

Tests:

Native
var a = 0.1; var b = 0.2; a + b
decimal.js
var a = new Decimal("0.1"); a.plus(.2).toNumber();

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 76 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 64 runs

Native

164.0M/s

decimal.js

1.4M/s

Fastest: Native (115.3x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ Native: 164,045,680 ops/sec
• decimal.js: 1,422,282 ops/sec

Firefox 7 runs

Native

1583.8M/s

decimal.js

1.9M/s

Fastest: Native (848.4x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ Native: 1,583,817,472 ops/sec
• decimal.js: 1,866,833 ops/sec

Mobile Results:

Chrome 5 runs

Native

98.9M/s

decimal.js

783K/s

Fastest: Native (126.4x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ Native: 98,930,472 ops/sec
• decimal.js: 782,907 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native
decimal.js

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 21 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/149.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 149 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Native

185.2M/s

decimal.js

1.3M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Native	185,213,760 Ops/sec
decimal.js	1,343,010 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its components.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark compares the performance of three libraries: `bignumber.js`, `big.js`, and `decimal.js` for performing arithmetic operations on decimal numbers.

Specifically, two test cases are used:

1. The native JavaScript implementation (i.e., without using any library) to add two decimal numbers.
2. Each library's implementation to add the same two decimal numbers.

**Options being compared**

The options being compared are the performance of each library when performing arithmetic operations on decimal numbers. This includes the execution speed, which is measured in executions per second (EPs/s).

**Pros and cons of different approaches:**

1. **Native JavaScript implementation:** This approach has no overhead due to external libraries, but it may not be as efficient or accurate as using a specialized library for decimal arithmetic.
	* Pros: No additional dependencies or complexity.
	* Cons: May not provide the same level of accuracy or performance as specialized libraries.
2. **bignumber.js implementation:** This library is designed specifically for high-precision arithmetic and has a reputation for being fast and accurate.
	* Pros: High-performance and accurate arithmetic operations.
	* Cons: Additional dependency and potential complexity.
3. **big.js implementation:** Another popular library for decimal arithmetic, big.js is known for its simplicity and performance.
	* Pros: Fast and efficient arithmetic operations with minimal overhead.
	* Cons: May not be as accurate as bignumber.js.

**Library overview:**

1. **bignumber.js**: Developed by Mike McLean, this library provides high-precision arithmetic operations and is designed to be fast and accurate. It uses the `Decimal` class to represent decimal numbers and offers various methods for performing arithmetic operations.
2. **big.js**: Also known as "Big" (not to be confused with bignumber.js), this library was developed by Paul Rossetti and provides high-performance decimal arithmetic operations using the `Big` constructor.
3. **decimal.js**: This library is designed specifically for decimal arithmetic and offers a simple, intuitive API for performing arithmetic operations.

**Special JavaScript features or syntax:**

The benchmark uses standard JavaScript syntax, without any special features or syntax that would be specific to recent ECMAScript standards (e.g., ES2015+).

**Considerations:**

When choosing a library for decimal arithmetic, consider the trade-offs between performance, accuracy, and complexity. If high-performance and accuracy are essential, bignumber.js might be the best choice. However, if simplicity and ease of use are more important, big.js or decimal.js could be suitable options.

**Alternatives:**

Other alternatives to these libraries include:

* **Fraction.js**: A library for rational arithmetic that provides a different approach to decimal arithmetic.
* **JS-Bigint**: A library for arbitrary-precision integer arithmetic, which can also be used for decimal arithmetic with some workarounds.
* **decimal-fraction.js**: A lightweight library for rational arithmetic that is designed for use in web applications.

Keep in mind that this benchmark only compares the performance of these three libraries, so it's essential to consider your specific requirements and evaluate other libraries if needed.

decimal.js vs. native (version: 0)

- https://github.com/MikeMcl/bignumber.js/tree/v9.0.0 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/big.js/tree/v5.2.2 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/decimal.js/tree/v10.2.0

Comparing performance of: `Native vs decimal.js`

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Native

decimal.js

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 76 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 64 runs

Firefox 7 runs

Mobile Results:

Chrome 5 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

decimal.js vs. native (version: 0)

- https://github.com/MikeMcl/bignumber.js/tree/v9.0.0 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/big.js/tree/v5.2.2 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/decimal.js/tree/v10.2.0

Comparing performance of: Native vs decimal.js

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Native

decimal.js

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 76 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 64 runs

Firefox 7 runs

Mobile Results:

Chrome 5 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Native vs decimal.js`