Benchmark: Native.toFixed() vs bignumber.js vs big.js vs decimal.js

HTML Preparation code:

<!--script src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iriscouch/bigdecimal.js/v0.6.1/lib/bigdecimal.js"></script-->
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/bignumber.js/9.0.1/bignumber.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/big.js/6.0.3/big.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/decimal.js/10.2.1/decimal.min.js"></script>
<!--script src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/infusion/Fraction.js/v4.0.12/fraction.min.js"></script-->

Tests:

decimal.js
var a = new Decimal("0.1"); var b = new Decimal("0.2"); a.plus(b).times(b).toString();
big.js
var a = new Big("0.1"); var b = new Big("0.2"); a.plus(b).mul(b).toString();
bignumber.js
var a = new BigNumber("0.1"); var b = new BigNumber("0.2"); a.plus(b).multipliedBy(b).toString();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
decimal.js
big.js
bignumber.js

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 122 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

big.js

1.3M/s

decimal.js

694K/s

bignumber.js

677K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ big.js	1,271,232 Ops/sec
decimal.js	693,826 Ops/sec
bignumber.js	676,917 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, compared options, pros and cons of those approaches, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares the performance of three libraries: `bignumber.js`, `big.js`, and `decimal.js`. The test cases are designed to measure the execution time of specific arithmetic operations using each library.

**Test Cases**

There are three individual test cases:

1. **`decimal.js`**: Measures the performance of decimal arithmetic using the `Decimal` class.
	* Benchmark Definition: `var a = new Decimal("0.1"); var b = new Decimal("0.2"); a.plus(b).times(b).toString();`
2. **`big.js`**: Measures the performance of big integer arithmetic using the `Big` class.
	* Benchmark Definition: `var a = new Big("0.1"); var b = new Big("0.2"); a.plus(b).mul(b).toString();`
3. **`bignumber.js`**: Measures the performance of big number arithmetic using the `BigNumber` class.
	* Benchmark Definition: `var a = new BigNumber("0.1"); var b = new BigNumber("0.2"); a.plus(b).multipliedBy(b).toString();`

**Comparison of Options**

The three libraries are compared in terms of their performance, precision, and usability.

* **Precision**: All three libraries support arbitrary-precision arithmetic, which means they can handle very large numbers without losing accuracy.
* **Performance**: The benchmark measures the execution time of each operation. `bignumber.js` is expected to be faster than the other two due to its optimized JavaScript implementation.
* **Usability**: Each library has its own strengths and weaknesses:
	+ `decimal.js`: Designed for precise decimal arithmetic, but may not be suitable for very large numbers.
	+ `big.js`: Provides a simple and intuitive API, but may not offer the same level of performance as `bignumber.js`.
	+ `bignumber.js`: Offers high performance and a robust feature set, making it a popular choice for big number arithmetic.

**Pros and Cons**

* **`decimal.js`**:
	+ Pros: Precise decimal arithmetic, easy to use.
	+ Cons: May not be suitable for very large numbers, slower than `bignumber.js`.
* **`big.js`**:
	+ Pros: Simple and intuitive API, fast execution times.
	+ Cons: May not offer the same level of performance as `bignumber.js`, limited features compared to other libraries.
* **`bignumber.js`**:
	+ Pros: High performance, robust feature set, suitable for very large numbers.
	+ Cons: Steeper learning curve due to its JavaScript implementation.

**Other Considerations**

* **Fraction.js**: Although not explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition, Fraction.js is a separate library that provides similar functionality to `decimal.js`. Its inclusion would further complicate the comparison.
* **NativetoFixed()**: The native JavaScript method `toFixed()` is also included in the benchmark. This method uses the browser's native arithmetic implementation and may not offer the same level of performance or precision as the libraries.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternatives to these libraries, consider:

* **`Big.js`**: A JavaScript implementation of the Big Number library.
* **`decimal.js`**: Another popular decimal arithmetic library.
* **`js-bigint`**: A lightweight JavaScript implementation of arbitrary-precision integers.
* **Native `toFixed()`**: For simple cases where precision and performance are not critical.

Ultimately, the choice of library depends on your specific requirements, such as precision, performance, or ease of use.

Native.toFixed() vs bignumber.js vs big.js vs decimal.js (version: 0)

- https://github.com/MikeMcl/bignumber.js/tree/v9.0.0 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/big.js/tree/v5.2.2 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/decimal.js/tree/v10.2.0

Comparing performance of: `decimal.js vs big.js vs bignumber.js`

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

decimal.js

big.js

bignumber.js

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Native.toFixed() vs bignumber.js vs big.js vs decimal.js (version: 0)

- https://github.com/MikeMcl/bignumber.js/tree/v9.0.0 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/big.js/tree/v5.2.2 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/decimal.js/tree/v10.2.0

Comparing performance of: decimal.js vs big.js vs bignumber.js

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

decimal.js

big.js

bignumber.js

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `decimal.js vs big.js vs bignumber.js`