Benchmark: asdfsadfsfsadf - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

loop
let arr = []; let brr = []; let crr = []; for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { arr.push({interal: i, title: i+1}); } for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { brr.push(arr[i].internal); crr.push(arr[i].title); }
map
let arr = []; let brr = []; let crr = []; for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { arr.push({interal: i, title: i+1}); } brr = arr.map(j => j.internal); crr = arr.map(j => j.title);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
loop
map

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is being tested, compared, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Definition**

The `Benchmark Definition` represents a JavaScript microbenchmark. It consists of:

1. **Script Preparation Code**: An empty string in this case, which means no setup code needs to be executed before running the benchmark.
2. **Html Preparation Code**: Also an empty string, indicating that no HTML preparation is required for the benchmark.
3. **Description and Name**: The name of the benchmark (`asdfsadfsfsadf`) and a description field left blank.

**Individual Test Cases**

The benchmark consists of two test cases:

1. **"loop"**: This test case measures the performance of a traditional `for` loop with array push operations.
2. **"map"**: This test case measures the performance of the `Array.prototype.map()` method, which applies a given function to each element of an array and returns a new array.

**Options Compared**

The two test cases compare the following options:

1. **Push vs. Map**: In the "loop" test case, elements are added to an array using the `push` method, whereas in the "map" test case, the same operation is performed using `Array.prototype.map()`.
2. **Explicit Array Push vs. Implicit Map**: In the "loop" test case, each element is pushed onto a separate array (`brr` and `crr`), while in the "map" test case, the result of `map()` is stored directly into an array (`crr`).

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

* **Push vs. Map**:
	+ Push: Can be faster for small arrays since it only requires a single operation.
	+ Map: More memory-efficient, especially for large datasets, since it avoids the overhead of creating multiple arrays.
* **Explicit Array Push vs. Implicit Map**:
	+ Explicit Push: Allows more control over the execution order and intermediate results.
	+ Implicit Map: Can be more concise and easier to read, as it eliminates the need for manual array manipulation.

**Other Considerations**

When writing benchmarks like this one:

1. **Use meaningful names**: Choose descriptive names for your test cases and benchmark definitions to make the output easier to understand.
2. **Keep it simple**: Avoid unnecessary complexity in your benchmark code to ensure accurate results.
3. **Test with multiple browsers and platforms**: Ensure that your benchmark is representative of different user bases by testing on various browsers, devices, and operating systems.

**Library Usage**

In this case, no libraries are explicitly used beyond the built-in `Array.prototype.map()` method.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

The provided code does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond standard ES5/ES6 language constructs.

Related benchmarks:

asdfsadfsfsadf (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: loop vs map

Created: 9 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

loop

map

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):