Benchmark: deepmerge vs Object.assign

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/deepmerge@4.2.2/dist/umd.js"></script>

Tests:

deepmerge
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', c: { a: 'a', b: { c: 'c' } } }; var b = { c: { b: { d: 'a' }, c: { d: 'd' } } }; var c = deepmerge({}, a, b);
Object.assign
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', c: { a: 'a', b: { c: 'c' } } }; var b = { c: { b: { d: 'a' }, c: { d: 'd' } } }; var c = Object.assign({}, a, b);
Spread operator
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', c: { a: 'a', b: { c: 'c' } } }; var b = { c: { b: { d: 'a' }, c: { d: 'd' } } }; var c = {...a, ...b};

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
deepmerge
Object.assign
Spread operator

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Spread operator

16.6M/s

Object.assign

7.2M/s

deepmerge

489K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Spread operator	16,551,564 Ops/sec
Object.assign	7,171,968 Ops/sec
deepmerge	489,254 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided benchmark measures the performance of three approaches to merge two objects in JavaScript:

1. `deepmerge`
2. `Object.assign`
3. Spread operator (`...`)

**Options Compared**

* `deepmerge`: A library that provides a recursive merge function, which can handle complex object structures.
* `Object.assign`: A built-in method for merging objects, but it only works with shallow object merges and doesn't support deep recursion.
* Spread operator: A modern JavaScript syntax that allows for efficient object merging.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **`deepmerge`**:
	* Pros:
		+ Handles complex object structures through recursion.
		+ Supports both shallow and deep merges.
	* Cons:
		+ Requires a separate library, adding dependency overhead.
2. **`Object.assign`**:
	* Pros:
		+ Built-in method, no additional dependencies required.
		+ Fast and efficient for shallow merges.
	* Cons:
		+ Limited to shallow object merges (can't handle recursive properties).
3. **Spread operator (`...`)**:
	* Pros:
		+ Modern JavaScript syntax, easy to understand and use.
		+ Fast and efficient for merging objects with similar structure.
	* Cons:
		+ Only supports shallow merges; can lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully.

**Library Usage**

The `deepmerge` library is used in the benchmark. It's a popular choice for handling complex object merges, but it adds an extra dependency compared to `Object.assign`.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

None of the tested approaches rely on any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's standard in modern browsers.

**Benchmark Result Interpretation**

The benchmark results show that:

* The spread operator (`...`) performs the best (fastest), indicating it's a good choice for shallow object merges.
* `Object.assign` is faster than `deepmerge`, but still slower than the spread operator. This suggests that while `Object.assign` is fast, its limited functionality might make it less suitable for complex object merges.
* `deepmerge` provides the best performance when dealing with deep object structures, making it a good choice for cases where complexity requires more advanced merging logic.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives to consider include:

1. **Lodash.merge**: Another popular library that offers more features and flexibility than `deepmerge`, but might come at a performance cost due to its additional complexity.
2. **Object merge libraries like merge-deep or immer**: These libraries offer more advanced merging capabilities, but might require careful consideration of their impact on performance.
3. **Native object merge approaches with recursive functions**: Implementing a custom recursive function for merging objects can be efficient and flexible, but requires manual handling of complexity and edge cases.

Keep in mind that these alternatives will have different trade-offs depending on your specific use case and requirements.

deepmerge vs Object.assign (version: 1) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `deepmerge vs Object.assign vs Spread operator`

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

deepmerge

Object.assign

Spread operator

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

deepmerge vs Object.assign (version: 1) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: deepmerge vs Object.assign vs Spread operator

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

deepmerge

Object.assign

Spread operator

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `deepmerge vs Object.assign vs Spread operator`