Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash merge vs deepmerge latest CDN
(version: 3)
Benchmark.js
Comparing performance of:
lodash merge vs deepmerge.all vs deepmerge
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Registered User
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script> <script src='https://unpkg.com/deepmerge@4.2.2/dist/umd.js'></script>
Tests:
lodash merge
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', c: { a: 'a', b: { c: 'c' } } }; var b = { c: { b: { d: 'a' }, c: { d: 'd' } } }; var c = _.merge({}, a, b);
deepmerge.all
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', c: { a: 'a', b: { c: 'c' } } }; var b = { c: { b: { d: 'a' }, c: { d: 'd' } } }; var c = deepmerge.all([{},a, b]);
deepmerge
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', c: { a: 'a', b: { c: 'c' } } }; var b = { c: { b: { d: 'a' }, c: { d: 'd' } } }; var c = deepmerge(a, b);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash merge
deepmerge.all
deepmerge
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=567622" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
deepmerge
668K/s
lodash merge
645K/s
deepmerge.all
457K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
deepmerge
667,722 Ops/sec
lodash merge
645,430 Ops/sec
deepmerge.all
456,740 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. **What is being tested?** The benchmark measures the performance of three different libraries for merging objects: Lodash, DeepMerge, and a custom implementation (DeepMerge.all). The tests focus on comparing the execution times of these libraries when merging two objects with nested structures. **Options compared** The three options being compared are: 1. **Lodash.merge**: A popular utility library that provides a versatile way to merge objects. 2. **DeepMerge**: A specialized library designed for deep object merging, which is optimized for performance and flexibility. 3. **DeepMerge.all**: A custom implementation of DeepMerge, likely used as a reference or for testing purposes. **Pros and cons** Here's a brief summary of each option: * **Lodash.merge**: Pros: + Wide adoption and large community support + Comprehensive set of utility functions + Well-documented and easy to use Cons: + May incur additional overhead due to its extensive feature set + Not optimized for deep object merging specifically * **DeepMerge**: Pros: + Optimized for performance and flexibility in deep object merging + Specifically designed for this task, reducing overhead compared to Lodash.merge + Well-performing and efficient Cons: + May not have the same breadth of features as Lodash.merge + Less widely adopted and community support may be smaller * **DeepMerge.all**: Pros: + Custom implementation that can be optimized for specific use cases (in this case, likely serving as a reference or test implementation) Cons: + Not widely used or maintained outside of the benchmarking context + May not represent a production-ready solution **Library usage and special features** * **Lodash**: The popular utility library used by Lodash.merge. It provides an extensive set of functions for manipulating data, including merging objects. * **DeepMerge**: A specialized library designed specifically for deep object merging. It's optimized for performance and flexibility in this specific task. No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in these benchmarks. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to DeepMerge for deep object merging, some options include: 1. **Immutable.js**: A library that provides immutable data structures and a set of utility functions for working with them. 2. **Ramda**: A functional programming library that includes a set of higher-order functions for manipulating data, including merging objects. 3. **Underscore.js**: Another popular utility library that provides a range of functions for manipulating data, including merging objects. Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own strengths and weaknesses, and may not offer the same level of performance or flexibility as DeepMerge.
Related benchmarks
lodash merge vs deepmerge.all
lodash merge vs deepmerge latest
lodash merge vs deepmerge vs Object.assign
Lodash merge vs deepmerge lksafkmasldsa
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?